RE: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks to hci_uart_proto structure.
Hi Alan, > From: linux-bluetooth-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-bluetooth- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of One Thousand Gnomes > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 8:49 PM > To: Amitkumar Karwar > Cc: linux-blueto...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Ganapathi Bhat > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks > to hci_uart_proto structure. > > On Thu, 5 May 2016 08:08:20 -0700 > Amitkumar Karwar <akar...@marvell.com> wrote: > > > From: Ganapathi Bhat <gb...@marvell.com> > > > > The new callback is used to prepare the device before HCI becomes > > ready. One can use this to download firmware if the download process > > doesn't use HCI commands. Also recv_for_prepare callback is introduced > > for receiving data from devices during prepare phase. > > If your device is not speaking HCI protocol then instead of hackig up > the HCI ldisc would it not make more sense to have a tiny ldisc for your > firmware loader instead of adding crap to the fast paths of what is > currently a clean properly separated out interface ? > Below is the code change. It won't add any overhead for existing receive path. - if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, >flags)) + if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, >flags)) { + if (hu->proto->recv_for_prepare) + hu->proto->recv_for_prepare(hu, data, count); return; + } Regards, Amitkumar
RE: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks to hci_uart_proto structure.
Hi Alan, > From: linux-bluetooth-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-bluetooth- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of One Thousand Gnomes > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 8:49 PM > To: Amitkumar Karwar > Cc: linux-blueto...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Ganapathi Bhat > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks > to hci_uart_proto structure. > > On Thu, 5 May 2016 08:08:20 -0700 > Amitkumar Karwar wrote: > > > From: Ganapathi Bhat > > > > The new callback is used to prepare the device before HCI becomes > > ready. One can use this to download firmware if the download process > > doesn't use HCI commands. Also recv_for_prepare callback is introduced > > for receiving data from devices during prepare phase. > > If your device is not speaking HCI protocol then instead of hackig up > the HCI ldisc would it not make more sense to have a tiny ldisc for your > firmware loader instead of adding crap to the fast paths of what is > currently a clean properly separated out interface ? > Below is the code change. It won't add any overhead for existing receive path. - if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, >flags)) + if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, >flags)) { + if (hu->proto->recv_for_prepare) + hu->proto->recv_for_prepare(hu, data, count); return; + } Regards, Amitkumar
Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks to hci_uart_proto structure.
On Thu, 5 May 2016 08:08:20 -0700 Amitkumar Karwarwrote: > From: Ganapathi Bhat > > The new callback is used to prepare the device before HCI becomes > ready. One can use this to download firmware if the download process > doesn't use HCI commands. Also recv_for_prepare callback is > introduced for receiving data from devices during prepare phase. If your device is not speaking HCI protocol then instead of hackig up the HCI ldisc would it not make more sense to have a tiny ldisc for your firmware loader instead of adding crap to the fast paths of what is currently a clean properly separated out interface ? Alan
Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: add prepare callbacks to hci_uart_proto structure.
On Thu, 5 May 2016 08:08:20 -0700 Amitkumar Karwar wrote: > From: Ganapathi Bhat > > The new callback is used to prepare the device before HCI becomes > ready. One can use this to download firmware if the download process > doesn't use HCI commands. Also recv_for_prepare callback is > introduced for receiving data from devices during prepare phase. If your device is not speaking HCI protocol then instead of hackig up the HCI ldisc would it not make more sense to have a tiny ldisc for your firmware loader instead of adding crap to the fast paths of what is currently a clean properly separated out interface ? Alan