RE: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dmitry, Thank you very much. Thanks, Dudley > -Original Message- > From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com] > Sent: 2015?1?18? 16:35 > To: Jeremiah Mahler; Dudley Du; rydb...@euromail.se; ble...@google.com; > David Solda; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > > Dudley, > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > > > Dudley, > > > > > > Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I > > > could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone > > > elses patch (not yours) [1]. > > > > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 > > > > > > Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch > > > series. > > > > > > > If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. > > Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. > > Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. > > > > Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler > > OK, I believe that the code is in good shape now, so I queued all > patches for 3.20 (currently in my 'next' branch and should show in > linux-next soon). Any subsequent improvements to the code > should be relative to this series. > > Jeremiah, thank you for testing the patches; Dudley thank you for your > patience with the process. > > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Jeremiah, Thanks. If there is something that I could do, please let me know. Thanks, Dudley > -Original Message- > From: Jeremiah Mahler [mailto:jmmah...@gmail.com] > Sent: 2015?1?18? 6:46 > To: David Solda > Cc: Dudley Du; dmitry.torok...@gmail.com; rydb...@euromail.se; > ble...@google.com; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches > > Dave, > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote: > > Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying > > that > the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? > > > > Dave > > > > I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly. > > git revert ea2c67bb4aff > > So I just reverted back to next-20150112. > > git reset --hard next-20150112 > > I hope the owner of the prior patch responds promptly and fixes their > bug. But for the time being the cyapa patch series works when that > other bug is avoided. > > If you have any suggestions, let me know. > > -- > - Jeremiah Mahler This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > Dudley, > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > > Dudley, > > > > Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I > > could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone > > elses patch (not yours) [1]. > > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 > > > > Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch > > series. > > > > If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. > Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. > Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. > > Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler OK, I believe that the code is in good shape now, so I queued all patches for 3.20 (currently in my 'next' branch and should show in linux-next soon). Any subsequent improvements to the code should be relative to this series. Jeremiah, thank you for testing the patches; Dudley thank you for your patience with the process. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Jeremiah, Thanks. If there is something that I could do, please let me know. Thanks, Dudley -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Mahler [mailto:jmmah...@gmail.com] Sent: 2015?1?18? 6:46 To: David Solda Cc: Dudley Du; dmitry.torok...@gmail.com; rydb...@euromail.se; ble...@google.com; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches Dave, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote: Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? Dave I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly. git revert ea2c67bb4aff So I just reverted back to next-20150112. git reset --hard next-20150112 I hope the owner of the prior patch responds promptly and fixes their bug. But for the time being the cyapa patch series works when that other bug is avoided. If you have any suggestions, let me know. -- - Jeremiah Mahler This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dmitry, Thank you very much. Thanks, Dudley -Original Message- From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com] Sent: 2015?1?18? 16:35 To: Jeremiah Mahler; Dudley Du; rydb...@euromail.se; ble...@google.com; David Solda; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: Dudley, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com OK, I believe that the code is in good shape now, so I queued all patches for 3.20 (currently in my 'next' branch and should show in linux-next soon). Any subsequent improvements to the code should be relative to this series. Jeremiah, thank you for testing the patches; Dudley thank you for your patience with the process. Thanks. -- Dmitry This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:39:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: Dudley, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com OK, I believe that the code is in good shape now, so I queued all patches for 3.20 (currently in my 'next' branch and should show in linux-next soon). Any subsequent improvements to the code should be relative to this series. Jeremiah, thank you for testing the patches; Dudley thank you for your patience with the process. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dave, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote: > Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying > that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? > > Dave > I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly. git revert ea2c67bb4aff So I just reverted back to next-20150112. git reset --hard next-20150112 I hope the owner of the prior patch responds promptly and fixes their bug. But for the time being the cyapa patch series works when that other bug is avoided. If you have any suggestions, let me know. -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? Dave > On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > > Dudley, > > Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I > could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone > elses patch (not yours) [1]. > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 > > Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch > series. > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:34:03PM +0800, Dudley Du wrote: >> V18 patches have below updates, details of other updates see history list: >> 1) Fix 'cyapa_runtime_suspend' undeclared compiling issue in latest >> kernel-next source code. Verified on next-20150114 with make C=1. >> 2) Optimize enter bootloader failed for some chipset takes longer time issue. > [...] > > -- > - Jeremiah Mahler This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dudley, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > Dudley, > > Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I > could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone > elses patch (not yours) [1]. > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 > > Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch > series. > If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:34:03PM +0800, Dudley Du wrote: > V18 patches have below updates, details of other updates see history list: > 1) Fix 'cyapa_runtime_suspend' undeclared compiling issue in latest >kernel-next source code. Verified on next-20150114 with make C=1. > 2) Optimize enter bootloader failed for some chipset takes longer time issue. [...] -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dave, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:00:29PM +, David Solda wrote: Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? Dave I tried to revert the patch but it didn't do so cleanly. git revert ea2c67bb4aff So I just reverted back to next-20150112. git reset --hard next-20150112 I hope the owner of the prior patch responds promptly and fixes their bug. But for the time being the cyapa patch series works when that other bug is avoided. If you have any suggestions, let me know. -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Can we just reverse the prior change that caused the bug, or are you saying that the owner of the prior patch has to fix it? Dave On Jan 17, 2015, at 2:44 AM, Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com wrote: Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:34:03PM +0800, Dudley Du wrote: V18 patches have below updates, details of other updates see history list: 1) Fix 'cyapa_runtime_suspend' undeclared compiling issue in latest kernel-next source code. Verified on next-20150114 with make C=1. 2) Optimize enter bootloader failed for some chipset takes longer time issue. [...] -- - Jeremiah Mahler This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:34:03PM +0800, Dudley Du wrote: V18 patches have below updates, details of other updates see history list: 1) Fix 'cyapa_runtime_suspend' undeclared compiling issue in latest kernel-next source code. Verified on next-20150114 with make C=1. 2) Optimize enter bootloader failed for some chipset takes longer time issue. [...] -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v18 00/12] input: cyapa: instruction of cyapa patches
Dudley, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:44:15AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: Dudley, Your patch series applies without issue but unfortunately I could not test them because I ran in to a bug created by someone elses patch (not yours) [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/17/24 Once that issue gets resolved I would be happy to test your patch series. If I go back to linux-next 20150112 I can avoid the drm/i915 bug. Then, with this patch series applied, everything works well. Suspend/resume work, and the touchpad operates as expected. Tested-by: Jeremiah Mahler jmmah...@gmail.com -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
