Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410
On 17.12.2015 14:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16.11.2015 16:43, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
>> controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
>> which is connected via SROMc bank #3.
>>
>> With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
>> Actually, only bank number is different.
>>
>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
>>
>> Pinctrl support is necessary in order to correctly configure
>> multifunctional pins of the Exynos chip.
>>
>
> Let me share the plan/status:
> 1. Currently Kukjin Kim is out of office (he told me he will be back on
> Christmas).
> 2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my previous pull requests.
>
> 3. I applied this patchset to my branch:
> next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
>
> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
>
> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
> for v4.6.
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
Hi Kukjin, Pankaj, Pavel,
I rebased these 3 patchsets (move SROM to drivers, add bank support,
mnove PMU to drivers) on v4.5-rc1 and re-organized the work on usual
arm-soc branches.
Hmmm, maybe not such "usual" because of the dependencies (DTS changes
are needed before removal of code from mach-exynos) this looks a little
bit different. Anyway I put it on a separate branch and tag:
1. samsung-drivers-soc-srom-pmu-4.6
2. samsung-dt-srom-4.6
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/
Everything is also in for-next. The point is that you don't have to do
anything as for now. I'll handle it for v4.6 (hopefully).
Tests on Trats2 passed fine. Now each commit is being tested on mine
Odroid XU3 (http://www.krzk.eu).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410
W dniu 18.12.2015 o 18:16, Pavel Fedin pisze:
> Hello!
>
>> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
>> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
>> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
>> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
>>
>> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
>> for v4.6.
>>
>> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work
> is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it
> until it goes to stable.
>
> P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing
> the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two
> directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm:
> 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos
> 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung
>
> In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and
> shouldn't this file be moved to (2)?
Thanks for hind but I already cleaned it up:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=068812ed108acbfe070b893faba9845fe2ea3fd9
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410
Hello!
> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
>
> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
> for v4.6.
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is
picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it
until it goes to stable.
P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing
the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two
directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm:
1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos
2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung
In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and
shouldn't this file be moved to (2)?
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410
On 16.11.2015 16:43, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
> controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
> which is connected via SROMc bank #3.
>
> With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
> Actually, only bank number is different.
>
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
>
> Pinctrl support is necessary in order to correctly configure
> multifunctional pins of the Exynos chip.
>
Let me share the plan/status:
1. Currently Kukjin Kim is out of office (he told me he will be back on
Christmas).
2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my previous pull requests.
3. I applied this patchset to my branch:
next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
not go into v4.5 (yay...).
5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
for v4.6.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
