Re: READ THIS NOW *BEFORE* RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD --> [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: add support for PCA9539
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:16:46PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:37:05 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> > Support for PCA9539 as a GPIO chip is separated into two patches:
> >
> > 0001 - gpiolib: basic support for 16-bit PCA9539 GPIO expander
> > 0002 - gpiolib: add Generic IRQ support for 16-bit PCA9539 GPIO expander
> >
> > the 2nd one uses workqueue for IRQ handling due to the interrupt mode
> > nature of the i2c-core, thus making it a separate patch.
>
> Note that the situation could change according to the discussion in
> this thread:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-December/002378.html
I'm afraid to have to say this, but your message (with its broken CC
header) has caused several people to be unsubscribed from this mailing
list.
The reason seems to be that the list expander rejected your message,
which causes bounces to be sent back to mailman for a _ton_ of people.
Strangely enough, I run the exact same check ("headers_syntax") on all
messages the list server receives, and when I test it with your message,
it correctly rejects it. Yet somehow it didn't earlier. No idea.
In any case, EVERYONE, please drop the invalid "David," in the CC list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: READ THIS NOW *BEFORE* RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD -- [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: add support for PCA9539
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:16:46PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Eric, On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:37:05 +0800, eric miao wrote: Support for PCA9539 as a GPIO chip is separated into two patches: 0001 - gpiolib: basic support for 16-bit PCA9539 GPIO expander 0002 - gpiolib: add Generic IRQ support for 16-bit PCA9539 GPIO expander the 2nd one uses workqueue for IRQ handling due to the interrupt mode nature of the i2c-core, thus making it a separate patch. Note that the situation could change according to the discussion in this thread: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-December/002378.html I'm afraid to have to say this, but your message (with its broken CC header) has caused several people to be unsubscribed from this mailing list. The reason seems to be that the list expander rejected your message, which causes bounces to be sent back to mailman for a _ton_ of people. Strangely enough, I run the exact same check (headers_syntax) on all messages the list server receives, and when I test it with your message, it correctly rejects it. Yet somehow it didn't earlier. No idea. In any case, EVERYONE, please drop the invalid David, in the CC list. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
