Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
> "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeff> He said memory to memory transfers. I also said data aquisition servers to data processing clients. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
He said memory to memory transfers. Jeff Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega byte) > > > memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 boxes. > > > > What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with networking. Who > > would be braindead enough to waste processing cycles passing Network > > data over a NUMA fabric anyway. There's a lot more efficient ways to > > I have bad news for you Jeff. Thats not a NUMA fabric. Thats GigE. Thats what > people plug larger than office sized servers into nowdays. Current NUMA fabrics > are a good factor of 10 faster still. > > Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
> > The equivalent to the netware specialist fast paths for file serving is Tux, > > and Tux currently holds a world record. I'd love to see Manos beat Linux + > > Tux at specweb. That would vindicate your arguments > > Who wrote Tux? USL while at Novell. Enough said. No, Ingo Molnar in Hungary with other open source community folks. I think you have the wrong tux Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
> "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeff> Jes Sorensen wrote: >> I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega >> byte) memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 >> boxes. Jeff> What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with Jeff> networking. Who would be braindead enough to waste processing Jeff> cycles passing Network data over a NUMA fabric anyway. There's Jeff> a lot more efficient ways to connect to boxes with NUMA than Jeff> using a TCPIP stack on a NUMA interconnect. NUMA? whats NUMA got to do with this? I am talking Gigabit Ethernet with Jumbo frames on standard commodity hardware between two standard 440BX based PCs. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
> > I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega byte) > > memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 boxes. > > What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with networking. Who > would be braindead enough to waste processing cycles passing Network > data over a NUMA fabric anyway. There's a lot more efficient ways to I have bad news for you Jeff. Thats not a NUMA fabric. Thats GigE. Thats what people plug larger than office sized servers into nowdays. Current NUMA fabrics are a good factor of 10 faster still. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
Alan Cox wrote: > > > file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S > > IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see > > which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet > > you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in every test. > > At what. IPX - sure. How about at telnet serving. > > The equivalent to the netware specialist fast paths for file serving is Tux, > and Tux currently holds a world record. I'd love to see Manos beat Linux + > Tux at specweb. That would vindicate your arguments Who wrote Tux? USL while at Novell. Enough said. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]
> file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S > IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see > which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet > you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in every test. At what. IPX - sure. How about at telnet serving. The equivalent to the netware specialist fast paths for file serving is Tux, and Tux currently holds a world record. I'd love to see Manos beat Linux + Tux at specweb. That would vindicate your arguments - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
