Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:36 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Bryan Wu wrote: > > This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not > > accept by the mainline. > > Did you see someone reject it, or did it just get lost? > > Actually no one response to the patch. Need I resend it to try again, -:))? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/29/24 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/28/63 -Bryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not accept by the mainline. Did you see someone reject it, or did it just get lost? Bernd -- This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers. Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368 Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: Need I disable CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in defconfigs for Blackfin to make the compile pass? That would be a workaround, yes. Better would be of course to fix the bug or the Kconfig dependency. Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 Thanks again, beautiful log and which defconfigs do you using to do the test and what's the toolchain version? All information is on the page: ld-version 2.17 gcc-version 4.1.2 (adi svn) make HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 ARCH=blackfin CROSS_COMPILE=bfin-elf- CROSS32_COMPILE= O=/tmp/tmp.vLOkGP3410/out/blackfin defconfig Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 08:54 +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Bryan Wu wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git > > for-linus > > > > to receive the following updates: > > > > arch/blackfin/mach-common/pm.c |6 ++ > > include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf561/cdefBF561.h |4 +- > > include/asm-blackfin/string.h | 129 > > +-- > > btw. what about this error? > > fs/binfmt_flat.c:760:50: error: macro "flat_get_addr_from_rp" requires 4 > arguments, but only 3 given > fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: ‘flat_get_addr_from_rp’ undeclared (first use in > this function) > fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: for each function it appears in.) > make[2]: *** [fs/binfmt_flat.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 > make: *** [_all] Error 2 > Thanks for the testing. > any chance to get that fixed prior to .23? (not a regression, but > happens approx. since blackfin was merged) > This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not accept by the mainline. It can be workaround by disabling CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in menuconfig. Need I disable CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in defconfigs for Blackfin to make the compile pass? > Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 Thanks again, beautiful log and which defconfigs do you using to do the test and what's the toolchain version? Best Regards -Bryan Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: Hi Linus, Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git for-linus to receive the following updates: arch/blackfin/mach-common/pm.c |6 ++ include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf561/cdefBF561.h |4 +- include/asm-blackfin/string.h | 129 +-- btw. what about this error? fs/binfmt_flat.c:760:50: error: macro "flat_get_addr_from_rp" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: ‘flat_get_addr_from_rp’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/binfmt_flat.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2 any chance to get that fixed prior to .23? (not a regression, but happens approx. since blackfin was merged) Thanks, Jan Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: Hi Linus, Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git for-linus to receive the following updates: arch/blackfin/mach-common/pm.c |6 ++ include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf561/cdefBF561.h |4 +- include/asm-blackfin/string.h | 129 +-- btw. what about this error? fs/binfmt_flat.c:760:50: error: macro flat_get_addr_from_rp requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: ‘flat_get_addr_from_rp’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/binfmt_flat.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2 any chance to get that fixed prior to .23? (not a regression, but happens approx. since blackfin was merged) Thanks, Jan Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 08:54 +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: Bryan Wu wrote: Hi Linus, Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git for-linus to receive the following updates: arch/blackfin/mach-common/pm.c |6 ++ include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf561/cdefBF561.h |4 +- include/asm-blackfin/string.h | 129 +-- btw. what about this error? fs/binfmt_flat.c:760:50: error: macro flat_get_addr_from_rp requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: ‘flat_get_addr_from_rp’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/binfmt_flat.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2 Thanks for the testing. any chance to get that fixed prior to .23? (not a regression, but happens approx. since blackfin was merged) This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not accept by the mainline. It can be workaround by disabling CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in menuconfig. Need I disable CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in defconfigs for Blackfin to make the compile pass? Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 Thanks again, beautiful log and which defconfigs do you using to do the test and what's the toolchain version? Best Regards -Bryan Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: Need I disable CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT in defconfigs for Blackfin to make the compile pass? That would be a workaround, yes. Better would be of course to fix the bug or the Kconfig dependency. Full build log: http://l4x.org/k/?d=34032 Thanks again, beautiful log and which defconfigs do you using to do the test and what's the toolchain version? All information is on the page: ld-version 2.17 gcc-version 4.1.2 (adi svn) make HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 ARCH=blackfin CROSS_COMPILE=bfin-elf- CROSS32_COMPILE= O=/tmp/tmp.vLOkGP3410/out/blackfin defconfig Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Bryan Wu wrote: This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not accept by the mainline. Did you see someone reject it, or did it just get lost? Bernd -- This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers. Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368 Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:36 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Bryan Wu wrote: This is because a binfmt_flat hacking patch for Blackfin arch is not accept by the mainline. Did you see someone reject it, or did it just get lost? Actually no one response to the patch. Need I resend it to try again, -:))? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/29/24 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/28/63 -Bryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
