Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for 5.10-rc7

2020-12-03 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello:

This pull request was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Thu,  3 Dec 2020 12:44:59 -0800 you wrote:
> The following changes since commit c84e1efae022071a4fcf9f1899bf71777c49943a:
> 
>   Merge tag 'asm-generic-fixes-5.10-2' of 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic (2020-11-27 
> 15:00:35 -0800)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git 
> tags/net-5.10-rc7
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [GIT,PULL] Networking for 5.10-rc7
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/bbe2ba04c5a9

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html




Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for 5.10-rc7

2020-12-03 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:18:13 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:45 PM Jakub Kicinski  wrote:
> > Networking fixes for 5.10-rc7, including fixes from bpf, netfilter,
> > wireless drivers, wireless mesh and can.  
> 
> Thanks, pulled.
> 
> And btw - maybe I've already talked about this, but since next week is
> (hopefully) going to be the last week of rc release: since the
> networking pulls tend to be some of the bigger ones, one thing I've
> asked David to do in the past is to (a) not send a big networking pull
> request right before the final release and (b) let me know whether
> there is anything worrisome going on in networking.
> 
> So if you send it on a Thursday (like this one), then that's all good
> - it's the "Oh, it's Sunday noon, I was planning on a final release in
> the afternoon, and I have a big networking fix pull request in my
> mailbox" that I'd prefer to not see.

Make sense.

I'm not anticipating that the last PR will be much smaller, given 
we get a constant stream of fixes for older releases and the review
coverage is pretty good so we can apply stuff with confidence.

Sounds like a comparable PR size will not be a major concern to you as
long as the PR comes in early on Thu and we are reporting any sign of
trouble. Sounds good!

> A heads up on the "Uhhuh - we have something bad going in the
> networking tree" kind of situation you can obviously send at any time.
> If there are known issues, I'll just make an rc8 - I prefer not to
> _have_ to, of course, but I'd always much rather be safe than release
> the final kernel just because I didn't know of some pending issue.

Will do!

> (And the reverse - just a note saying "everything looks fine, none of
> this is scary and there's nothing pending that looks at all worrisome
> either" - for the last rc pull is obviously also always appreciated,
> but generally I'll assume that unless something else is said, we're in
> good shape).

Ack, it's been smooth sailing so far in this release. 

No big scares, knock on wood.

This time around (other than the large-ish ibmvnic set which was in 
the works for a while) the PR was smaller, but I think that's only 
due to Turkey lethargy.

Thanks for this note, I was shy to ask about the endgame :)


Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for 5.10-rc7

2020-12-03 Thread pr-tracker-bot
The pull request you sent on Thu,  3 Dec 2020 12:44:59 -0800:

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git tags/net-5.10-rc7

has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/bbe2ba04c5a92a49db8a42c850a5a2f6481e47eb

Thank you!

-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html


Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for 5.10-rc7

2020-12-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:45 PM Jakub Kicinski  wrote:
>
> Networking fixes for 5.10-rc7, including fixes from bpf, netfilter,
> wireless drivers, wireless mesh and can.

Thanks, pulled.

And btw - maybe I've already talked about this, but since next week is
(hopefully) going to be the last week of rc release: since the
networking pulls tend to be some of the bigger ones, one thing I've
asked David to do in the past is to (a) not send a big networking pull
request right before the final release and (b) let me know whether
there is anything worrisome going on in networking.

So if you send it on a Thursday (like this one), then that's all good
- it's the "Oh, it's Sunday noon, I was planning on a final release in
the afternoon, and I have a big networking fix pull request in my
mailbox" that I'd prefer to not see.

A heads up on the "Uhhuh - we have something bad going in the
networking tree" kind of situation you can obviously send at any time.
If there are known issues, I'll just make an rc8 - I prefer not to
_have_ to, of course, but I'd always much rather be safe than release
the final kernel just because I didn't know of some pending issue.

(And the reverse - just a note saying "everything looks fine, none of
this is scary and there's nothing pending that looks at all worrisome
either" - for the last rc pull is obviously also always appreciated,
but generally I'll assume that unless something else is said, we're in
good shape).

Linus