Re: [LINUX PATCH 2/2] xen/pvhvm: Support more than 32 VCPUs when migrating.

2014-04-09 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 09.04.14 at 12:15,  wrote:

> On Apr 9, 2014 4:03 AM, Jan Beulich  wrote:
>>
>> >>> On 08.04.14 at 19:25,  wrote: 
>> > + /* Only Xen 4.5 and higher supports this. */ 
>> > + if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_is_up, smp_processor_id(), NULL) == 
> -ENOSYS) 
>> > + vcpuops = false; 
>>
>> Did you mean to say "for HVM guests" in the comment? And of 
>> course the comment could quickly become stale if we backported 
>> the Xen side change to e.g. 4.4.1. 
>>
> 
> Right. But I thought that features like that (new hypercalls) wasn't 
> applicable for backporting?

It's not really a new hypercall, and fixing a problem, so I'd consider
it a candidate at least for 4.4.1.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [LINUX PATCH 2/2] xen/pvhvm: Support more than 32 VCPUs when migrating.

2014-04-09 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

On Apr 9, 2014 4:03 AM, Jan Beulich  wrote:
>
> >>> On 08.04.14 at 19:25,  wrote: 
> > + /* Only Xen 4.5 and higher supports this. */ 
> > + if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_is_up, smp_processor_id(), NULL) == 
> > -ENOSYS) 
> > + vcpuops = false; 
>
> Did you mean to say "for HVM guests" in the comment? And of 
> course the comment could quickly become stale if we backported 
> the Xen side change to e.g. 4.4.1. 
>

Right. But I thought that features like that (new hypercalls) wasn't applicable 
for backporting?

Thabksy
> Jan 
>
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+{zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v���zZ+��+zf���h���~i���z��w���?�&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Re: [LINUX PATCH 2/2] xen/pvhvm: Support more than 32 VCPUs when migrating.

2014-04-09 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 08.04.14 at 19:25,  wrote:
> + /* Only Xen 4.5 and higher supports this. */
> + if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_is_up, smp_processor_id(), NULL) == 
> -ENOSYS)
> + vcpuops = false;

Did you mean to say "for HVM guests" in the comment? And of
course the comment could quickly become stale if we backported
the Xen side change to e.g. 4.4.1.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/