Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] udf: Fix memory leak in udf_process_sequence()

2020-09-23 Thread Peilin Ye
Hi,

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:04:05PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 22-09-20 11:45:31, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > udf_process_sequence() is leaking memory. Free `data.part_descs_loc`
> > before returning.
> > 
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 7b78fd02fb19 ("udf: Fix handling of Partition Descriptors")
> > Reported-and-tested-by: 
> > syzbot+128f4dd6e796c98b3...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Link: 
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c5ec4e6f5d818f3c4afd4d59342468eec08a38da
> > Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye 
> 
> Thanks for the patch but I've just yesterday written exactly the same patch
> and merged it to my tree...

Ah, no worries, happy to see the bug gets fixed!

Peilin Ye


Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] udf: Fix memory leak in udf_process_sequence()

2020-09-23 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 22-09-20 11:45:31, Peilin Ye wrote:
> udf_process_sequence() is leaking memory. Free `data.part_descs_loc`
> before returning.
> 
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 7b78fd02fb19 ("udf: Fix handling of Partition Descriptors")
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+128f4dd6e796c98b3...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Link: 
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c5ec4e6f5d818f3c4afd4d59342468eec08a38da
> Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye 

Thanks for the patch but I've just yesterday written exactly the same patch
and merged it to my tree...

Honza

> ---
>  fs/udf/super.c | 20 +---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index 1c42f544096d..b0d862ab3024 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -1698,7 +1698,8 @@ static noinline int udf_process_sequence(
>   "Pointers (max %u supported)\n",
>   UDF_MAX_TD_NESTING);
>   brelse(bh);
> - return -EIO;
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
>   }
>  
>   vdp = (struct volDescPtr *)bh->b_data;
> @@ -1718,7 +1719,8 @@ static noinline int udf_process_sequence(
>   curr = get_volume_descriptor_record(ident, bh, &data);
>   if (IS_ERR(curr)) {
>   brelse(bh);
> - return PTR_ERR(curr);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(curr);
> + goto out;
>   }
>   /* Descriptor we don't care about? */
>   if (!curr)
> @@ -1740,28 +1742,32 @@ static noinline int udf_process_sequence(
>*/
>   if (!data.vds[VDS_POS_PRIMARY_VOL_DESC].block) {
>   udf_err(sb, "Primary Volume Descriptor not found!\n");
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out;
>   }
>   ret = udf_load_pvoldesc(sb, data.vds[VDS_POS_PRIMARY_VOL_DESC].block);
>   if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>  
>   if (data.vds[VDS_POS_LOGICAL_VOL_DESC].block) {
>   ret = udf_load_logicalvol(sb,
>   data.vds[VDS_POS_LOGICAL_VOL_DESC].block,
>   fileset);
>   if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>   }
>  
>   /* Now handle prevailing Partition Descriptors */
>   for (i = 0; i < data.num_part_descs; i++) {
>   ret = udf_load_partdesc(sb, data.part_descs_loc[i].rec.block);
>   if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>   }
>  
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> +out:
> + kfree(data.part_descs_loc);
> + return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara 
SUSE Labs, CR