Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Export memory limit via device tree

2012-07-19 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose

On 07/11/2012 11:06 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c 
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index c957b12..0c9695d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static struct property crashk_size_prop = {
.value = _size,
  };

+static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
+   .name = "linux,memory-limit",
+   .length = sizeof(phys_addr_t),
+   .value = _limit,
+};
+


AFAIK. phys_addr_t can change size, so instead make it point to a known
fixes size quantity (a u64).

Ben,

Sorry for the delay in the response.

Some of the other properties are also of phys_addr_t, (e.g 
linux,crashkernel-base, linux,kernel-end ). Should we fix them as well ?


Or

Should we leave this also a phys_addr_t and let the userspace handle it ?




+
+   /* memory-limit is needed for constructing the crash regions */
+   prop = of_find_property(node, memory_limit_prop.name, NULL);
+   if (prop)
+   prom_remove_property(node, prop);
+
+   if (memory_limit)
+   prom_add_property(node, _limit_prop);
+


There's a patch floating around making prom_update_property properly
handle both pre-existing and non-pre-existing props, you should probably
base yourself on top of it. I'm about to stick that patch in powerpc
-next


OK. I am testing the new patch based on the above commit. I will wait
for the clarification on the issue of the type, before I post it here.

Thanks
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Export memory limit via device tree

2012-07-19 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose

On 07/11/2012 11:06 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c 
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index c957b12..0c9695d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static struct property crashk_size_prop = {
.value = crashk_size,
  };

+static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
+   .name = linux,memory-limit,
+   .length = sizeof(phys_addr_t),
+   .value = memory_limit,
+};
+


AFAIK. phys_addr_t can change size, so instead make it point to a known
fixes size quantity (a u64).

Ben,

Sorry for the delay in the response.

Some of the other properties are also of phys_addr_t, (e.g 
linux,crashkernel-base, linux,kernel-end ). Should we fix them as well ?


Or

Should we leave this also a phys_addr_t and let the userspace handle it ?




+
+   /* memory-limit is needed for constructing the crash regions */
+   prop = of_find_property(node, memory_limit_prop.name, NULL);
+   if (prop)
+   prom_remove_property(node, prop);
+
+   if (memory_limit)
+   prom_add_property(node, memory_limit_prop);
+


There's a patch floating around making prom_update_property properly
handle both pre-existing and non-pre-existing props, you should probably
base yourself on top of it. I'm about to stick that patch in powerpc
-next


OK. I am testing the new patch based on the above commit. I will wait
for the clarification on the issue of the type, before I post it here.

Thanks
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Export memory limit via device tree

2012-07-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index c957b12..0c9695d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static struct property crashk_size_prop = {
>   .value = _size,
>  };
>  
> +static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
> + .name = "linux,memory-limit",
> + .length = sizeof(phys_addr_t),
> + .value = _limit,
> +};
> +

AFAIK. phys_addr_t can change size, so instead make it point to a known
fixes size quantity (a u64).

> +
> + /* memory-limit is needed for constructing the crash regions */
> + prop = of_find_property(node, memory_limit_prop.name, NULL);
> + if (prop)
> + prom_remove_property(node, prop);
> +
> + if (memory_limit)
> + prom_add_property(node, _limit_prop);
> +

There's a patch floating around making prom_update_property properly
handle both pre-existing and non-pre-existing props, you should probably
base yourself on top of it. I'm about to stick that patch in powerpc
-next

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Export memory limit via device tree

2012-07-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c 
 b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
 index c957b12..0c9695d 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
 @@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static struct property crashk_size_prop = {
   .value = crashk_size,
  };
  
 +static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
 + .name = linux,memory-limit,
 + .length = sizeof(phys_addr_t),
 + .value = memory_limit,
 +};
 +

AFAIK. phys_addr_t can change size, so instead make it point to a known
fixes size quantity (a u64).

 +
 + /* memory-limit is needed for constructing the crash regions */
 + prop = of_find_property(node, memory_limit_prop.name, NULL);
 + if (prop)
 + prom_remove_property(node, prop);
 +
 + if (memory_limit)
 + prom_add_property(node, memory_limit_prop);
 +

There's a patch floating around making prom_update_property properly
handle both pre-existing and non-pre-existing props, you should probably
base yourself on top of it. I'm about to stick that patch in powerpc
-next

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/