RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-29 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawn...@kernel.org]
> Sent: 2016-08-29 3:24 PM
> To: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>; Yongcai Huang
> <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Fabio
> Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; li...@armlinux.org.uk;
> ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
> > about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
> > should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
> > architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
> > being absent is confusing.
> 
> Anson,
> 
> Is there any concern or problem if we follow Lucas' suggestion to
> unconditionally calls flush_cache_all() here?
> 
> Shawn

Because this code is in idle thread, my original aim is to make the latency as
small as possible, but since the double L1 flush here should finish very quick 
at this
stage and compare to hardware ARM core power down/up latency, it should be
negligible as Lucas mentioned, yes, I agree to remove condition check here and
just call L1 flush again to avoid any confusion. Will send out a V2 patch 
later, thanks.

Anson.

RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-29 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawn...@kernel.org]
> Sent: 2016-08-29 3:24 PM
> To: Lucas Stach ; Yongcai Huang
> 
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Fabio
> Estevam ; li...@armlinux.org.uk;
> ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
> > about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
> > should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
> > architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
> > being absent is confusing.
> 
> Anson,
> 
> Is there any concern or problem if we follow Lucas' suggestion to
> unconditionally calls flush_cache_all() here?
> 
> Shawn

Because this code is in idle thread, my original aim is to make the latency as
small as possible, but since the double L1 flush here should finish very quick 
at this
stage and compare to hardware ARM core power down/up latency, it should be
negligible as Lucas mentioned, yes, I agree to remove condition check here and
just call L1 flush again to avoid any confusion. Will send out a V2 patch 
later, thanks.

Anson.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-29 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
> about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
> should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
> architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
> being absent is confusing.

Anson,

Is there any concern or problem if we follow Lucas' suggestion to
unconditionally calls flush_cache_all() here?

Shawn

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-29 Thread Shawn Guo 
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
> about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
> should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
> architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
> being absent is confusing.

Anson,

Is there any concern or problem if we follow Lucas' suggestion to
unconditionally calls flush_cache_all() here?

Shawn

RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-25 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Chen [mailto:hzpeterc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 2016-08-25 3:09 PM
> To: Yongcai Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
> Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org;
> li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> > +static bool pl310_available;
> > +
> 
> 
> >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > +   if (!pl310_available)
> 
> Just wondering why you need an extra variable here?
> Calling of_find_compatible_node takes long time at that time?
> 
> Peter
> 

Because cpu idle enter/exit is called very frequently, so calling
of_find_compatible_node in every cpu idle thread is adding too
many latency, I think adding a variable is better.

Anson

> > +   flush_cache_all();
> > cpu_do_idle();
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
> >
> > +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> > +   pl310_available = true;
> > +
> > return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);  } diff
> > --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> > +#include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)  { @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@
> > static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)  {
> > +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> > imx6_pm_opp_init();
> > platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1,
> > NULL, 0);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > ___
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-25 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Chen [mailto:hzpeterc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 2016-08-25 3:09 PM
> To: Yongcai Huang 
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; lkml ;
> Fabio Estevam ; shawn...@kernel.org;
> li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> > +static bool pl310_available;
> > +
> 
> 
> >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > +   if (!pl310_available)
> 
> Just wondering why you need an extra variable here?
> Calling of_find_compatible_node takes long time at that time?
> 
> Peter
> 

Because cpu idle enter/exit is called very frequently, so calling
of_find_compatible_node in every cpu idle thread is adding too
many latency, I think adding a variable is better.

Anson

> > +   flush_cache_all();
> > cpu_do_idle();
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
> >
> > +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> > +   pl310_available = true;
> > +
> > return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);  } diff
> > --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> > +#include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)  { @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@
> > static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)  {
> > +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> > imx6_pm_opp_init();
> > platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1,
> > NULL, 0);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > ___
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-25 Thread Peter Chen 
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
>
>  #include "common.h"
>  #include "cpuidle.h"
>
> +static bool pl310_available;
> +


>  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)
>  {
> +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> +   if (!pl310_available)

Just wondering why you need an extra variable here?
Calling of_find_compatible_node takes long time at that time?

Peter

> +   flush_cache_all();
> cpu_do_idle();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
>
> +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> +   pl310_available = true;
> +
> return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include 
>
>  #include "common.h"
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
>
>  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
>
>  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)
>  {
> +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> +
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> imx6_pm_opp_init();
> platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> ___
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-25 Thread Peter Chen 
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
>
>  #include "common.h"
>  #include "cpuidle.h"
>
> +static bool pl310_available;
> +


>  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)
>  {
> +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> +   if (!pl310_available)

Just wondering why you need an extra variable here?
Calling of_find_compatible_node takes long time at that time?

Peter

> +   flush_cache_all();
> cpu_do_idle();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
>
> +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> +   pl310_available = true;
> +
> return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include 
>
>  #include "common.h"
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
>
>  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
>
>  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)
>  {
> +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> +
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> imx6_pm_opp_init();
> platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> ___
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> To: Yongcai Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Fabio
> Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org;
> li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > supported:
> >
> > 1. ARM WFI;
> > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> >
> > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > external
> > L2 cache.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> > +static bool pl310_available;
> > +
> >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > +   if (!pl310_available)
> > +   flush_cache_all();
> 
> I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with the
> ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> states.
> 
> Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it should do 
> the
> right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. There 
> is
> no need to make this conditional.
> 

Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will work 
on my mutt later.

Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with ARM 
powered off.

The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for i.MX6SX 
which is with a 
PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no need 
to flush it.

For i.MX6UL which is cortex A7 and has integrated L2 cache, the L2 memory power 
will be also
turned off when ARM core is powered off, so we have to flush it before power 
off.

Regards,
Anson


> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> > cpu_do_idle();
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
> >
> > +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> > +   pl310_available = true;
> > +
> > return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);  } diff --git
> > a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> > +#include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)  { @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@
> > static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)  {
> > +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> > imx6_pm_opp_init();
> > platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL,
> 0);
>

RE: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Yongcai Huang 


Best Regards!
Anson Huang



> -Original Message-
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> To: Yongcai Huang 
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Fabio
> Estevam ; shawn...@kernel.org;
> li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > supported:
> >
> > 1. ARM WFI;
> > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> >
> > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > external
> > L2 cache.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> > +static bool pl310_available;
> > +
> >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > +   if (!pl310_available)
> > +   flush_cache_all();
> 
> I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with the
> ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> states.
> 
> Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it should do 
> the
> right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. There 
> is
> no need to make this conditional.
> 

Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will work 
on my mutt later.

Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with ARM 
powered off.

The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for i.MX6SX 
which is with a 
PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no need 
to flush it.

For i.MX6UL which is cortex A7 and has integrated L2 cache, the L2 memory power 
will be also
turned off when ARM core is powered off, so we have to flush it before power 
off.

Regards,
Anson


> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> > cpu_do_idle();
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> > imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
> >
> > +   if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> > +   pl310_available = true;
> > +
> > return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);  } diff --git
> > a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >
> >  #include "common.h"
> > +#include "cpuidle.h"
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)  { @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@
> > static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
> >
> >  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)  {
> > +   imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> > imx6_pm_opp_init();
> > platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL,
> 0);
>

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux 
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 09:53 + schrieb Yongcai Huang:
> > 
> > 
> > Best Regards!
> > Anson Huang
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> > > Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> > > To: Yongcai Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> > > Fabio
> > > Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org;
> > > li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> > > 
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > > > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > > > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > > > supported:
> > > >
> > > > 1. ARM WFI;
> > > > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > > > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> > > >
> > > > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > > > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > > > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > > > external
> > > > L2 cache.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> > > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > > +#include 
> > > > +#include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >
> > > >  #include "common.h"
> > > >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> > > >
> > > > +static bool pl310_available;
> > > > +
> > > >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > > > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > > > +   if (!pl310_available)
> > > > +   flush_cache_all();
> > > 
> > > I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with 
> > > the
> > > ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> > > states.
> > > 
> > > Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it 
> > > should do the
> > > right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. 
> > > There is
> > > no need to make this conditional.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will 
> > work on my mutt later.
> > 
> > Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with 
> > ARM powered off.
> > 
> Okay, makes sense.
> 
> > The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for 
> > i.MX6SX which is with a 
> > PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no 
> > need to flush it.
> > 
> As far as I can see flush_cache_all() only flushes architected caches.
> The PL310 is NOT an architected, but an outer cache, so it will not be
> touched by flush_cache_all() even if it is present. So the condition to
> only do this when the PL310 isn't present isn't needed.

Look again.  The patch is only calling flush_cache_all() if the L2C-310
is _not_ present.  So, the question about flush_cache_all() touching
the L2C-310 is irrelevant.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux 
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:04:50PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 09:53 + schrieb Yongcai Huang:
> > 
> > 
> > Best Regards!
> > Anson Huang
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> > > Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> > > To: Yongcai Huang 
> > > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> > > Fabio
> > > Estevam ; shawn...@kernel.org;
> > > li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> > > 
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > > > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > > > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > > > supported:
> > > >
> > > > 1. ARM WFI;
> > > > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > > > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> > > >
> > > > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > > > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > > > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > > > external
> > > > L2 cache.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> > > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > > +#include 
> > > > +#include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >  #include 
> > > >
> > > >  #include "common.h"
> > > >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> > > >
> > > > +static bool pl310_available;
> > > > +
> > > >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > > > +   /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > > > +   if (!pl310_available)
> > > > +   flush_cache_all();
> > > 
> > > I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with 
> > > the
> > > ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> > > states.
> > > 
> > > Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it 
> > > should do the
> > > right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. 
> > > There is
> > > no need to make this conditional.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will 
> > work on my mutt later.
> > 
> > Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with 
> > ARM powered off.
> > 
> Okay, makes sense.
> 
> > The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for 
> > i.MX6SX which is with a 
> > PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no 
> > need to flush it.
> > 
> As far as I can see flush_cache_all() only flushes architected caches.
> The PL310 is NOT an architected, but an outer cache, so it will not be
> touched by flush_cache_all() even if it is present. So the condition to
> only do this when the PL310 isn't present isn't needed.

Look again.  The patch is only calling flush_cache_all() if the L2C-310
is _not_ present.  So, the question about flush_cache_all() touching
the L2C-310 is irrelevant.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Lucas Stach 
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 09:53 + schrieb Yongcai Huang:
> 
> 
> Best Regards!
> Anson Huang
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> > Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> > To: Yongcai Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> > Fabio
> > Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org;
> > li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> > 
> > Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > > supported:
> > >
> > > 1. ARM WFI;
> > > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> > >
> > > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > > external
> > > L2 cache.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > > +#include 
> > > +#include 
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > >
> > >  #include "common.h"
> > >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> > >
> > > +static bool pl310_available;
> > > +
> > >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > > + /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > > + if (!pl310_available)
> > > + flush_cache_all();
> > 
> > I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with the
> > ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> > states.
> > 
> > Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it should 
> > do the
> > right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. 
> > There is
> > no need to make this conditional.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will 
> work on my mutt later.
> 
> Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with 
> ARM powered off.
> 
Okay, makes sense.

> The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for i.MX6SX 
> which is with a 
> PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no 
> need to flush it.
> 
As far as I can see flush_cache_all() only flushes architected caches.
The PL310 is NOT an architected, but an outer cache, so it will not be
touched by flush_cache_all() even if it is present. So the condition to
only do this when the PL310 isn't present isn't needed.

Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
being absent is confusing.

> For i.MX6UL which is cortex A7 and has integrated L2 cache, the L2 memory 
> power will be also
> turned off when ARM core is powered off, so we have to flush it before power 
> off.
> 
Yes, this is completely right.

Regards,
Lucas

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Lucas Stach 
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 09:53 + schrieb Yongcai Huang:
> 
> 
> Best Regards!
> Anson Huang
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> > Sent: 2016-08-24 5:09 PM
> > To: Yongcai Huang 
> > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> > Fabio
> > Estevam ; shawn...@kernel.org;
> > li...@armlinux.org.uk; ker...@pengutronix.de
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
> > 
> > Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> > > This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it reuses i.MX6SX's
> > > cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> > > supported:
> > >
> > > 1. ARM WFI;
> > > 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> > > 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> > >
> > > As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2 cache, so need to
> > > add L2 cache type check to decide if to flush L2 when entering idle
> > > with ARM power off, this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310
> > > external
> > > L2 cache.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> > > @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > > +#include 
> > > +#include 
> > >  #include 
> > >  #include 
> > >
> > >  #include "common.h"
> > >  #include "cpuidle.h"
> > >
> > > +static bool pl310_available;
> > > +
> > >  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)  {
> > > + /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> > > + if (!pl310_available)
> > > + flush_cache_all();
> > 
> > I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with the
> > ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow idle 
> > states.
> > 
> > Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it should 
> > do the
> > right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310 cache is present. 
> > There is
> > no need to make this conditional.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, my mutt is NOT working now, so I just reply you using outlook, will 
> work on my mutt later.
> 
> Yes, the imx6sx_idle_finish is only called when entering deepest idle with 
> ARM powered off.
> 
Okay, makes sense.

> The common cpu_suspend framework already takes care of L1 cache, for i.MX6SX 
> which is with a 
> PL310 external L2 cache, as L2 cache memory is NOT powered down, so we no 
> need to flush it.
> 
As far as I can see flush_cache_all() only flushes architected caches.
The PL310 is NOT an architected, but an outer cache, so it will not be
touched by flush_cache_all() even if it is present. So the condition to
only do this when the PL310 isn't present isn't needed.

Personally I would just remove the condition, but if you are concerned
about the double L1 flush overhead (I wouldn't worry about this, it
should be negligible) you should really make this conditional on an
architected L2 being present. Making it conditional on the outer cache
being absent is confusing.

> For i.MX6UL which is cortex A7 and has integrated L2 cache, the L2 memory 
> power will be also
> turned off when ARM core is powered off, so we have to flush it before power 
> off.
> 
Yes, this is completely right.

Regards,
Lucas

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Lucas Stach 
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it
> reuses i.MX6SX's cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> supported:
> 
> 1. ARM WFI;
> 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> 
> As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2
> cache, so need to add L2 cache type check to decide
> if to flush L2 when entering idle with ARM power off,
> this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310 external
> L2 cache.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "common.h"
>  #include "cpuidle.h"
>  
> +static bool pl310_available;
> +
>  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)
>  {
> + /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> + if (!pl310_available)
> + flush_cache_all();

I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with
the ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow
idle states.

Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it
should do the right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310
cache is present. There is no need to make this conditional.

Regards,
Lucas
 
>   cpu_do_idle();
>  
>   return 0;
> @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
>   imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
>   imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
>  
> + if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> + pl310_available = true;
> +
>   return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "common.h"
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
>  
>  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
>  
>  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)
>  {
> + imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> +
>   if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
>   imx6_pm_opp_init();
>   platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul

2016-08-24 Thread Lucas Stach 
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it
> reuses i.MX6SX's cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> supported:
> 
> 1. ARM WFI;
> 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
> 
> As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2
> cache, so need to add L2 cache type check to decide
> if to flush L2 when entering idle with ARM power off,
> this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310 external
> L2 cache.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c|  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "common.h"
>  #include "cpuidle.h"
>  
> +static bool pl310_available;
> +
>  static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)
>  {
> + /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> + if (!pl310_available)
> + flush_cache_all();

I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with
the ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow
idle states.

Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it
should do the right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310
cache is present. There is no need to make this conditional.

Regards,
Lucas
 
>   cpu_do_idle();
>  
>   return 0;
> @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
>   imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
>   imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
>  
> + if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> + pl310_available = true;
> +
>   return cpuidle_register(_cpuidle_driver, NULL);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "common.h"
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
>  
>  static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
>  
>  static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)
>  {
> + imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> +
>   if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
>   imx6_pm_opp_init();
>   platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);