RE: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
It has been in my -next branch and I will send it out for 4.2-rc1. Thanks, rui > -Original Message- > From: Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 2:46 AM > To: Rafael J. Wysocki > Cc: Jacob Pan; Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun; Rao, Nikhil > Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing > Importance: High > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman > wrote: > > > Can we make this patch available for 4.2 > > > > It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for > > 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. > > I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights Landing > patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it was added. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795 > > > > > >
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: >> > Can we make this patch available for 4.2 >> >> It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 >> I've just sent. > > I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights > Landing patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it > was added. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795 I was talking about the RAPL driver, sorry for the noise. The powerclamp one is the Rui's area. Rui, what's the status of this one? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: > > Can we make this patch available for 4.2 > > It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 > I've just sent. I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights Landing patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it was added. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: Can we make this patch available for 4.2 It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights Landing patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it was added. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: Can we make this patch available for 4.2 It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights Landing patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it was added. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795 I was talking about the RAPL driver, sorry for the noise. The powerclamp one is the Rui's area. Rui, what's the status of this one? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
It has been in my -next branch and I will send it out for 4.2-rc1. Thanks, rui -Original Message- From: Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 2:46 AM To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jacob Pan; Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun; Rao, Nikhil Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing Importance: High On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 01:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: Can we make this patch available for 4.2 It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. I just checked the branch pm+acpi-4.2-rc1 and i don't see the Knights Landing patch for the powerclamp driver in that. Kindly verify that it was added. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/795
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: > Can we make this patch available for 4.2 It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
Can we make this patch available for 4.2
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:59 PM
> To: Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman
> Cc: Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun; Rao, Nikhil
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:33:34 -0700
> Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
> wrote:
>
> > Adding Jacob Pan
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
> > > This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
> > > next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture code named
> > > "Knights Landing"
> > >
> looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Jacob Pan
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
> > > ---
> > > drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id
> > > intel_powerclamp_ids[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
> > > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
> > > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
> > > + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
> > > {}
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jacob Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
Can we make this patch available for 4.2
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:59 PM
To: Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman
Cc: Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun; Rao, Nikhil
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:33:34 -0700
Dasaratharaman Chandramouli dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com
wrote:
Adding Jacob Pan
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture code named
Knights Landing
looks good.
Acked-by: Jacob Pan jacob.jun@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com ---
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id
intel_powerclamp_ids[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
+ { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
--
Jacob Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Monday, June 22, 2015 04:51:13 PM Chandramouli, Dasaratharaman wrote: Can we make this patch available for 4.2 It is included in the power management and ACPI pull request for 4.1-rc1 I've just sent. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:33:34 -0700
Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
wrote:
> Adding Jacob Pan
>
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
> > This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
> > next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture
> > code named "Knights Landing"
> >
looks good.
Acked-by: Jacob Pan
> > Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id
> > intel_powerclamp_ids[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
> > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
> > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
> > + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
> > {}
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
>
>
--
Jacob Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
Adding Jacob Pan
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
> This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
> next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture
> code named "Knights Landing"
>
> Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
> + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:33:34 -0700
Dasaratharaman Chandramouli dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com
wrote:
Adding Jacob Pan
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture
code named Knights Landing
looks good.
Acked-by: Jacob Pan jacob.jun@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com ---
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id
intel_powerclamp_ids[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
+ { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
--
Jacob Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] intel powerclamp: support Knights Landing
Adding Jacob Pan
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:31 -0700, Dasaratharaman Chandramouli wrote:
This patch enables intel_powerclamp driver to run on the
next-generation Intel(R) Xeon Phi Microarchitecture
code named Knights Landing
Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
dasaratharaman.chandramo...@intel.com
---
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
index 12623bc..e34ccd5 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4c},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x4d},
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x56},
+ { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 0x57},
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
