Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

2020-12-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Adrian,

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:24 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
 wrote:
> On 12/20/20 9:51 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > To enable seccomp constant action bitmaps, we need to have a static
> > mapping to the audit architecture and system call table size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> > ---
> > Needed for CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG.
> > Note that upstream doesn't have m68k seccomp support yet.
>
> Have we added SECCOMP support for m68k to the kernel yet?

No, but I have applied locally the patches floating on the list...

> It's actually something I was hoping to do over the holidays ;-).

Happy to hear that!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

2020-12-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Geert!

On 12/20/20 9:51 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> To enable seccomp constant action bitmaps, we need to have a static
> mapping to the audit architecture and system call table size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> ---
> Needed for CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG.
> Note that upstream doesn't have m68k seccomp support yet.

Have we added SECCOMP support for m68k to the kernel yet?

It's actually something I was hoping to do over the holidays ;-).

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913