Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active

2019-10-07 Thread Stefan
On 07/10/2019 03:26, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:24:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:49:10PM +, Stefan Reiter wrote:
>>> Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if
>>> dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for
>>> debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always
>>> spew out its message.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree,
>>> while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the
>>> hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to
>>> work).
>>>
>>> Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree")
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter 
>>
>> Queued for testing and review, thank you!
> 
> And here is an updated version to make the special case of a nocb GP
> kthread having no other nocb CB kthreads look less strange.  Does this
> work for you?

Tested just now, works for me. Thanks for the additional fix!

> 
>   Thanx, Paul
> 
> 
> 
> commit e6223b0705369750990c32ddc80251942e61be30
> Author: Stefan Reiter 
> Date:   Fri Oct 4 19:49:10 2019 +
> 
>  rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active
> 
>  Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if
>  dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for
>  debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always
>  spew out its message.
> 
>  This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree,
>  while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the
>  hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to
>  work).
> 
>  Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if 
> dump_tree")
>  Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter 
>  [ paulmck: Make single-nocbs-CPU GP kthreads look less erroneous. ]
>  Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index d5334e4..d43f4e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2295,6 +2295,8 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(void)
>   {
>   int cpu;
>   bool firsttime = true;
> + bool gotnocbs = false;
> + bool gotnocbscbs = true;
>   int ls = rcu_nocb_gp_stride;
>   int nl = 0;  /* Next GP kthread. */
>   struct rcu_data *rdp;
> @@ -2317,21 +2319,31 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(void)
>   rdp = per_cpu_ptr(_data, cpu);
>   if (rdp->cpu >= nl) {
>   /* New GP kthread, set up for CBs & next GP. */
> + gotnocbs = true;
>   nl = DIV_ROUND_UP(rdp->cpu + 1, ls) * ls;
>   rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp;
>   rdp_gp = rdp;
> - if (!firsttime && dump_tree)
> - pr_cont("\n");
> - firsttime = false;
> - pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:", __func__, cpu);
> + if (dump_tree) {
> + if (!firsttime)
> + pr_cont("%s\n", gotnocbscbs
> + ? "" : " (self only)");
> + gotnocbscbs = false;
> + firsttime = false;
> + pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:",
> +  __func__, cpu);
> + }
>   } else {
>   /* Another CB kthread, link to previous GP kthread. */
> + gotnocbscbs = true;
>   rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp_gp;
>   rdp_prev->nocb_next_cb_rdp = rdp;
> - pr_alert(" %d", cpu);
> + if (dump_tree)
> + pr_cont(" %d", cpu);
>   }
>   rdp_prev = rdp;
>   }
> + if (gotnocbs && dump_tree)
> + pr_cont("%s\n", gotnocbscbs ? "" : " (self only)");
>   }
> 
>   /*
> 



Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active

2019-10-06 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:24:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:49:10PM +, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> > Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if
> > dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for
> > debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always
> > spew out its message.
> > 
> > This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree,
> > while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the
> > hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to
> > work).
> > 
> > Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree")
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter 
> 
> Queued for testing and review, thank you!

And here is an updated version to make the special case of a nocb GP
kthread having no other nocb CB kthreads look less strange.  Does this
work for you?

Thanx, Paul



commit e6223b0705369750990c32ddc80251942e61be30
Author: Stefan Reiter 
Date:   Fri Oct 4 19:49:10 2019 +

rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active

Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if
dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for
debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always
spew out its message.

This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree,
while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the
hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to
work).

Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter 
[ paulmck: Make single-nocbs-CPU GP kthreads look less erroneous. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index d5334e4..d43f4e0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2295,6 +2295,8 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(void)
 {
int cpu;
bool firsttime = true;
+   bool gotnocbs = false;
+   bool gotnocbscbs = true;
int ls = rcu_nocb_gp_stride;
int nl = 0;  /* Next GP kthread. */
struct rcu_data *rdp;
@@ -2317,21 +2319,31 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(void)
rdp = per_cpu_ptr(_data, cpu);
if (rdp->cpu >= nl) {
/* New GP kthread, set up for CBs & next GP. */
+   gotnocbs = true;
nl = DIV_ROUND_UP(rdp->cpu + 1, ls) * ls;
rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp;
rdp_gp = rdp;
-   if (!firsttime && dump_tree)
-   pr_cont("\n");
-   firsttime = false;
-   pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:", __func__, cpu);
+   if (dump_tree) {
+   if (!firsttime)
+   pr_cont("%s\n", gotnocbscbs
+   ? "" : " (self only)");
+   gotnocbscbs = false;
+   firsttime = false;
+   pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:",
+__func__, cpu);
+   }
} else {
/* Another CB kthread, link to previous GP kthread. */
+   gotnocbscbs = true;
rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp_gp;
rdp_prev->nocb_next_cb_rdp = rdp;
-   pr_alert(" %d", cpu);
+   if (dump_tree)
+   pr_cont(" %d", cpu);
}
rdp_prev = rdp;
}
+   if (gotnocbs && dump_tree)
+   pr_cont("%s\n", gotnocbscbs ? "" : " (self only)");
 }
 
 /*


Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active

2019-10-04 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:49:10PM +, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if
> dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for
> debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always
> spew out its message.
> 
> This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree,
> while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the
> hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to
> work).
> 
> Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter 

Queued for testing and review, thank you!

> ---
> 
> First time contributing to the kernel, hope I'm doing this right :)

Looks good so far.  Then again, I just kicked off the tests.  ;-)

Thanx, Paul

>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 14 +-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 2defc7fe74c3..7cbf4a0f3eff 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2346,15 +2346,19 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(void)
>   nl = DIV_ROUND_UP(rdp->cpu + 1, ls) * ls;
>   rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp;
>   rdp_gp = rdp;
> - if (!firsttime && dump_tree)
> - pr_cont("\n");
> - firsttime = false;
> - pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:", __func__, cpu);
> + if (dump_tree) {
> + if (!firsttime)
> + pr_cont("\n");
> + firsttime = false;
> + pr_alert("%s: No-CB GP kthread CPU %d:",
> +  __func__, cpu);
> + }
>   } else {
>   /* Another CB kthread, link to previous GP kthread. */
>   rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp_gp;
>   rdp_prev->nocb_next_cb_rdp = rdp;
> - pr_alert(" %d", cpu);
> + if (dump_tree)
> + pr_cont(" %d", cpu);
>   }
>   rdp_prev = rdp;
>   }
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 
>