On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 07:50:13AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:10:55AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > The ifndef for SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE was placed under the
> > ifndef for the SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER feature. This will not
> > work on systems that do support SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER but do not
> > support SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE. So move the latter ifndef out of
> > the former ifndef's scope.
> >
> > 2019-10-20 11:14:01 make run_tests -C seccomp
> > make: Entering directory
> > '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-0eebfed2954f152259cae0ad57b91d3ea92968e8/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp'
> > gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall seccomp_bpf.c -lpthread -o seccomp_bpf
> > seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘user_notification_continue’:
> > seccomp_bpf.c:3562:15: error: ‘SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE’ undeclared
> > (first use in this function)
> > resp.flags = SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE;
> >^~~~
> > seccomp_bpf.c:3562:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
> > once for each function it appears in
> > Makefile:12: recipe for target 'seccomp_bpf' failed
> > make: *** [seccomp_bpf] Error 1
> > make: Leaving directory
> > '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-0eebfed2954f152259cae0ad57b91d3ea92968e8/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp'
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot
> > Fixes: 0eebfed2954f ("seccomp: test SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE")
> > Cc: linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner
>
> Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen
Thanks! Applied to my for-next/seccomp tree.
--
Kees Cook
