Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-21 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
> > From: Tim Chen 
> > Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
> > implementations
> 
>sha: is not a proper subsystem name
> 
>x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one
> 
> >  Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations
> 
> This patch does not enable any checks. It merily adds the feature bit.
>  
> > The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
> > performance
> > of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.
> 
> Again there is no check.
> 
> > This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
> > 
> > The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
> > Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
> > https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf
> > 
> > Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
> 
> So Mouli left the company. What's the point of having his Intel mail
> address here and in the Cc list?

Thomas,

Thanks for your input.  Hopefully the attached patch below
addresses issues you've raised.  Mouli was copied on his new 
email address too. 

Tim

--->8---
From: Tim Chen 
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpufeatures: Enable cpuid for Intel SHA extensions

Add Intel CPUID for Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions. This feature
provides new instructions for accelerated computation of SHA-1 and SHA-256.
This allows the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo for cpus that
support it.

Refer to SHA extension programming guide in chapter 8.2 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference
for definition of this feature's cpuid: CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EBX.SHA [bit 29] 
= 1
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-21 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
 On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
  From: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
  Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
  implementations
 
sha: is not a proper subsystem name
 
x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one
 
   Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations
 
 This patch does not enable any checks. It merily adds the feature bit.
  
  The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
  performance
  of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.
 
 Again there is no check.
 
  This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
  
  The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
  Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
  https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf
  
  Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
 
 So Mouli left the company. What's the point of having his Intel mail
 address here and in the Cc list?

Thomas,

Thanks for your input.  Hopefully the attached patch below
addresses issues you've raised.  Mouli was copied on his new 
email address too. 

Tim

---8---
From: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpufeatures: Enable cpuid for Intel SHA extensions

Add Intel CPUID for Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions. This feature
provides new instructions for accelerated computation of SHA-1 and SHA-256.
This allows the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo for cpus that
support it.

Refer to SHA extension programming guide in chapter 8.2 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference
for definition of this feature's cpuid: CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EBX.SHA [bit 29] 
= 1
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mouli_7...@yahoo.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
> From: Tim Chen 
> Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
> implementations

   sha: is not a proper subsystem name

   x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one

>  Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

This patch does not enable any checks. It merily adds the feature bit.
 
> The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
> performance
> of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

Again there is no check.

> This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
> Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
> https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf
> 
> Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 

So Mouli left the company. What's the point of having his Intel mail
address here and in the Cc list?

Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 06:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:

> > Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
> > I'm picking it up.
> 
> So the SOB chain should be:
> 
> From: you
> 
> 
> 
> Originally-by: Mouli
> Signed-off-by: you
> 

Thanks.  Revised patch embedded below.

Tim

--->8---
From: Tim Chen 
Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
implementations

The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
performance
of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.

The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 06:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:

  Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
  I'm picking it up.
 
 So the SOB chain should be:
 
 From: you
 
 commit message
 
 Originally-by: Mouli
 Signed-off-by: you
 

Thanks.  Revised patch embedded below.

Tim

---8---
From: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
implementations

The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
performance
of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.

The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
 From: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
 Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions 
 implementations

   sha: is not a proper subsystem name

   x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one

  Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

This patch does not enable any checks. It merily adds the feature bit.
 
 The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
 performance
 of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

Again there is no check.

 This will allow the feature to be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
 
 The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
 Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
 https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf
 
 Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com

So Mouli left the company. What's the point of having his Intel mail
address here and in the Cc list?

Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 
> > 
> > And now the question who authored this complex one liner 
> > 
> 
> Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
> I'm picking it up.

So the SOB chain should be:

From: you



Originally-by: Mouli
Signed-off-by: you

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 
(AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Tim Chen
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 
> 
> And now the question who authored this complex one liner 
> 

Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
I'm picking it up.

Tim

> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
> > Reciprocal */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict 
> > Detection */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
> > Extensions */
> >  
> >  /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Tim Chen
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
 On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
  Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
  Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
 
 And now the question who authored this complex one liner 
 

Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
I'm picking it up.

Tim

  ---
   arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
  
  diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
  b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
  index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
  --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
  +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
  @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
   #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
   #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
  Reciprocal */
   #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict 
  Detection */
  +#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
  Extensions */
   
   /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
   #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
  -- 
  1.8.3.1
  
  
  
  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
 On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
  On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
   Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
   Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
  
  And now the question who authored this complex one liner 
  
 
 Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company.  So
 I'm picking it up.

So the SOB chain should be:

From: you

commit message

Originally-by: Mouli
Signed-off-by: you

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 
(AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-18 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 

And now the question who authored this complex one liner 

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
> Reciprocal */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI   ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
> Extensions */
>  
>  /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-18 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
 Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com

And now the question who authored this complex one liner 

 ---
  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 
 diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
 b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
 index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
 +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
 @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
 Reciprocal */
  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
 +#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI   ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
 Extensions */
  
  /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
  #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
 -- 
 1.8.3.1
 
 
 
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Tim Chen
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
> >  #define cpu_has_eager_fpu  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> >  #define cpu_has_topoextboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
> >  #define cpu_has_bpext  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
> > +#define cpu_has_sha_ni boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI)
> 
> I think we're trying not to add these cpu_has_* macros any more.  For
> MPX at least we were encouraged to call cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_*) directly.
> 
> In the patch description, it might also be nice to remind folks that
> this will feature will also show up as "sha_ni" in /proc/cpuinfo.

Okay, in that case, I've modified the patch to below:

Tim

--->8---

Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions
 implementations
To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , H. 
Peter Anvin 
Cc: Herbert Xu , Chandramouli Narayanan 
, x...@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
performance
of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

This will allow the feature to be shown as sha_ni in the /proc/cpuinfo.

The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan 
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Dave Hansen
On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
>  #define cpu_has_eager_fpuboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
>  #define cpu_has_topoext  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
>  #define cpu_has_bpextboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
> +#define cpu_has_sha_ni   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI)

I think we're trying not to add these cpu_has_* macros any more.  For
MPX at least we were encouraged to call cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_*) directly.

In the patch description, it might also be nice to remind folks that
this will feature will also show up as "sha_ni" in /proc/cpuinfo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Tim Chen
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
 On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
  @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
   #define cpu_has_eager_fpu  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
   #define cpu_has_topoextboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
   #define cpu_has_bpext  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
  +#define cpu_has_sha_ni boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI)
 
 I think we're trying not to add these cpu_has_* macros any more.  For
 MPX at least we were encouraged to call cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_*) directly.
 
 In the patch description, it might also be nice to remind folks that
 this will feature will also show up as sha_ni in /proc/cpuinfo.

Okay, in that case, I've modified the patch to below:

Tim

---8---

Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions
 implementations
To: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar mi...@redhat.com, H. 
Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
Cc: Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au, Chandramouli Narayanan 
mo...@linux.intel.com, x...@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The Intel Secure Hash Algorithm Extensions are designed to improve the 
performance
of SHA-1 and SHA-256. This patch adds the check for X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI bit.

This will allow the feature to be shown as sha_ni in the /proc/cpuinfo.

The SHA extension programming guide is found in chapter 8 of the Intel
Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming reference:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf

Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan mo...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 3d6606f..a94f83d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512PF   ( 9*32+26) /* AVX-512 Prefetch */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512ER   ( 9*32+27) /* AVX-512 Exponential and 
Reciprocal */
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512CD   ( 9*32+28) /* AVX-512 Conflict Detection */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI ( 9*32+29) /* SHA1/SHA256 Instruction 
Extensions */
 
 /* Extended state features, CPUID level 0x000d:1 (eax), word 10 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT   (10*32+ 0) /* XSAVEOPT */
-- 
1.8.3.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Dave Hansen
On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
 @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
  #define cpu_has_eager_fpuboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
  #define cpu_has_topoext  boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
  #define cpu_has_bpextboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
 +#define cpu_has_sha_ni   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI)

I think we're trying not to add these cpu_has_* macros any more.  For
MPX at least we were encouraged to call cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_*) directly.

In the patch description, it might also be nice to remind folks that
this will feature will also show up as sha_ni in /proc/cpuinfo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/