Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

Also I think the email list is rejecting your replies because they're
in html?

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

Also I think the email list is rejecting your replies because they're
in html?

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:27:26AM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I reported this bug since more than 95% callsites of nlmsg_put are
> well handled in kernel, and many of them also allocated skb before.
> 

That's probably true, but the NULL check is not required *here*.

Just mark it as a false positive in your tool and move on...  It's not
like we are close to running out of real bugs to deal with.

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:27:26AM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I reported this bug since more than 95% callsites of nlmsg_put are
> well handled in kernel, and many of them also allocated skb before.
> 

That's probably true, but the NULL check is not required *here*.

Just mark it as a false positive in your tool and move on...  It's not
like we are close to running out of real bugs to deal with.

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:09:24PM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> When nlmsg_put fails, the lack of error-handling code may
> cause unexpected results.
> 
> This patch adds error-handling code after calling nlmsg_put.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyang Jia 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c 
> b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> index abe2425..4623140 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, 
> void *msg, int len)
>   seq++;
>  
>   nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, seq, type, len, 0);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;

This can't fail.  We just allocated skb on the line before and we
allocated enough space for "len".  Also if we *did* hit a bug here then
we would need to do some more cleanup instead of a direct return.

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:09:24PM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> When nlmsg_put fails, the lack of error-handling code may
> cause unexpected results.
> 
> This patch adds error-handling code after calling nlmsg_put.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyang Jia 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c 
> b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> index abe2425..4623140 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, 
> void *msg, int len)
>   seq++;
>  
>   nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, seq, type, len, 0);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;

This can't fail.  We just allocated skb on the line before and we
allocated enough space for "len".  Also if we *did* hit a bug here then
we would need to do some more cleanup instead of a direct return.

regards,
dan carpenter