Re: [PATCH] tty/serial:Remove superfluous "breaks"

2021-02-23 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:06:30PM +0800, dingsen...@163.com wrote:
> From: dingsenjie 
> 
> Remove superfluous "breaks", as there is a "return" before them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: dingsenjie 

You are at least the fourth person who sends this patch[1]. The things I
wrote in reply to the latest submission still applies:

 - the Subject is wrong, it should use a prefix similar to "serial: imx:".

 - I personally like the breaks for clarity.

 - If people agree enough to outvote me, please at least add an empty
   line instead of just removing the break to visually separate the
   cases.

Thanks
Uwe

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026125142.21105-1-zhangqilo...@huawei.com
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020130709.28096-1-t...@redhat.com
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201107140129.kpfhanzjidvdg...@pengutronix.de

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH] tty/serial:Remove superfluous "breaks"

2021-02-23 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:06:30PM +0800, dingsen...@163.com wrote:
> From: dingsenjie 
> 
> Remove superfluous "breaks", as there is a "return" before them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: dingsenjie 
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 425624d..6c1c31a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -300,7 +300,6 @@ static u32 imx_uart_readl(struct imx_port *sport, u32 
> offset)
>   switch (offset) {
>   case UCR1:
>   return sport->ucr1;
> - break;
>   case UCR2:
>   /*
>* UCR2_SRST is the only bit in the cached registers that might
> @@ -311,16 +310,12 @@ static u32 imx_uart_readl(struct imx_port *sport, u32 
> offset)
>   if (!(sport->ucr2 & UCR2_SRST))
>   sport->ucr2 = readl(sport->port.membase + offset);
>   return sport->ucr2;
> - break;
>   case UCR3:
>   return sport->ucr3;
> - break;
>   case UCR4:
>   return sport->ucr4;
> - break;
>   case UFCR:
>   return sport->ufcr;
> - break;
>   default:
>   return readl(sport->port.membase + offset);
>   }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
  the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
  match).  Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches
  for how to do this correctly.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot