Re: [PATCH] x86: make __{save,restore}_processor_state static
* Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .. allowing to remove their declarations from a global include file > (the symbols don't exist for anything but x86). > > Likewise for 64-bits' fix_processor_context(), just that that one was > properly declared in an arch-specific header. thanks, applied your patch to x86.git, for v2.6.25. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] x86: make __{save,restore}_processor_state static
* Jan Beulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. allowing to remove their declarations from a global include file (the symbols don't exist for anything but x86). Likewise for 64-bits' fix_processor_context(), just that that one was properly declared in an arch-specific header. thanks, applied your patch to x86.git, for v2.6.25. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/