Re: [PATCH] x86: unify extable_{32|64}.c

2007-12-18 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Harvey,
> 
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > Introduce fixup_exception() on X86_64 and use it in kprobes to
> > eliminate an #ifdef.
> > 
> > Only X86_64 needs search_extable() due to a stepping bug.
> 
> It's a good work!
> If you can work on it, please add a prototype declaration of
> fixup_exception() in asm-x86/uaccess_64.h too.

FYI, i've already added this to x86.git, it was needed for 64-bit to 
build fine.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] x86: unify extable_{32|64}.c

2007-12-18 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Hi Harvey,

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Introduce fixup_exception() on X86_64 and use it in kprobes to
> eliminate an #ifdef.
> 
> Only X86_64 needs search_extable() due to a stepping bug.

It's a good work!
If you can work on it, please add a prototype declaration of
fixup_exception() in asm-x86/uaccess_64.h too.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c |   12 +
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile_32   |2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile_64   |2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/extable.c |   62 
> +
>  arch/x86/mm/extable_32.c  |   35 -
>  arch/x86/mm/extable_64.c  |   34 
>  6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 1a0d96d..045a45e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -902,19 +902,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, 
> int trapnr)
>* In case the user-specified fault handler returned
>* zero, try to fix up.
>*/
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - {
> - const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
> - fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->ip);
> - if (fixup) {
> - regs->ip = fixup->fixup;
> - return 1;
> - }
> - }
> -#else
>   if (fixup_exception(regs))
>   return 1;
> -#endif
> +
>   /*
>* fixup routine could not handle it,
>* Let do_page_fault() fix it.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_32 b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_32
> index a01aca7..6a5e981 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_32
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_32
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  # Makefile for the linux i386-specific parts of the memory manager.
>  #
>  
> -obj-y:= init_32.o pgtable_32.o fault_32.o ioremap_32.o extable_32.o 
> pageattr_32.o mmap.o
> +obj-y:= init_32.o pgtable_32.o fault_32.o ioremap_32.o extable.o 
> pageattr_32.o mmap.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += discontig_32.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_64 b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_64
> index b5a7448..09c997f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_64
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile_64
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  # Makefile for the linux x86_64-specific parts of the memory manager.
>  #
>  
> -obj-y := init_64.o fault_64.o ioremap_64.o extable_64.o 
> pageattr_64.o mmap.o
> +obj-y := init_64.o fault_64.o ioremap_64.o extable.o pageattr_64.o 
> mmap.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += numa_64.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_K8_NUMA) += k8topology_64.o
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..7e8db53
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +
> +
> +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PNPBIOS
> + if (unlikely(SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE(regs->cs))) {
> + extern u32 pnp_bios_fault_eip, pnp_bios_fault_esp;
> + extern u32 pnp_bios_is_utter_crap;
> + pnp_bios_is_utter_crap = 1;
> + printk(KERN_CRIT "PNPBIOS fault.. attempting recovery.\n");
> + __asm__ volatile(
> + "movl %0, %%esp\n\t"
> + "jmp *%1\n\t"
> + : : "g" (pnp_bios_fault_esp), "g" (pnp_bios_fault_eip));
> + panic("do_trap: can't hit this");
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->ip);
> + if (fixup) {
> + regs->ip = fixup->fixup;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +/*
> + * Need to defined our own search_extable on X86_64 to work around
> + * a B stepping K8 bug.
> + */
> +const struct exception_table_entry *
> +search_extable(const struct exception_table_entry *first,
> +const struct exception_table_entry *last,
> +unsigned long value)
> +{
> + /* B stepping K8 bug */
> + if ((value >> 32) == 0)
> + value |= 0xUL << 32;
> +
> + while (first <= last) {
> + const struct exception_table_entry *mid;
> + long diff;
> +
> + mid = (last - first) / 2 + first;
> + diff = mid->insn - value;
> + if (diff == 0)
> + return mid;
> + else if (diff < 0)
> + first = mid+1;
> + else
> + last = mid-1;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable_32.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 4168546..000
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/extable

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify extable_{32|64}.c

2007-12-18 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Introduce fixup_exception() on X86_64 and use it in kprobes to 
> eliminate an #ifdef.
> 
> Only X86_64 needs search_extable() due to a stepping bug.

thanks, applied.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/