Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. An updated patch is available from git, and applies against netdev-2.6's upstream branch (as of commit 77aab8bf22042d1658d4adbca8b71779e7f2d0ff ) git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 e1000 Again, also available per http: http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/e1000_hw_init_layer_rewrite-v2-upstream.patch http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/e1000_hw_init_layer_rewrite-v2-upstream.patch.bz2 This version contains a few minor adjustments and updates to the one posted earlier this morning (and replaces that patch): 1) 82541 bitmask issue 2) 80003es2lan timeout value fix 3) added some more kdoc headers to functions 4) removed #ifdef NETIF_F_TSO6 forgotten by cleanup patch I hope this patch works for everyone, please let me know if there are still problems. Cheers, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:16:27 +0100 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 Perhaps the "e1000_" prefix could be dropped as redundant? -- Yes, that suggestion would agree with what Linus told us about usb file names 7 years ago. (huh? that long?) You'll have to excuse me that I don't remember that anymore, but I'll note the suggestion and see what the team thinks. Thanks, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:16:27 +0100 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 > > Perhaps the "e1000_" prefix could be dropped as redundant? > -- Yes, that suggestion would agree with what Linus told us about usb file names 7 years ago. (huh? that long?) --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 Perhaps the "e1000_" prefix could be dropped as redundant? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. those are not in sync atm, but I'll get you one against Jeff's upstream tree, that'll take a minute, or five. Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew, All, This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and separates e1000 hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an API that will allow us to continue to maintain the complex e1000 driver and add new hardware support to it without touching code that affects older chipsets. Thats good. but: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.c | 1077 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.h | 159 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_defines.h | 1289 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 470 +- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 9038 - drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h | 3859 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.c | 2353 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.h | 108 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.c | 1921 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.h | 84 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c| 1002 ++-- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.c | 387 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.h | 83 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.c | 860 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.h | 61 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_osdep.h | 56 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 115 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.c | 1932 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.h | 157 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_regs.h| 236 + 32 files changed, 18538 insertions(+), 13160 deletions(-) Is lots of little files really progress? I can think of a few files that we could merge myself, but we really wanted to get away from the two large (e1000_hw) files that we had, which was far worse. We're open to suggestions as to reduce the amount of files, but since e1000 has it's own subdirectory, and supports a large amount of files, I think we're in the right direction with the amount. We approached it this from a rather superfluous amount of files standpoint knowing we can merge some later anyway. One thing we've contemplated ourselves was to merge the smaller .h files into the .c files where applicable, so your comment goes duly noted Thanks, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew, All, > > This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and > separates e1000 > hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an > API that > will allow us to continue to maintain the complex e1000 driver and add new > hardware > support to it without touching code that affects older chipsets. Thats good. but: > drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.c | 1077 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.h | 159 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_defines.h | 1289 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 470 +- > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 9038 > - > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h | 3859 ++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.c | 2353 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.h | 108 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.c | 1921 +++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.h | 84 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c| 1002 ++-- > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.c | 387 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.h | 83 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.c | 860 +++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.h | 61 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_osdep.h | 56 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 115 > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.c | 1932 +++ > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.h | 157 + > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_regs.h| 236 + > 32 files changed, 18538 insertions(+), 13160 deletions(-) Is lots of little files really progress? -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, All, This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and separates e1000 hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an API that will allow us to continue to maintain the complex e1000 driver and add new hardware support to it without touching code that affects older chipsets. Thats good. but: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.c | 1077 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.h | 159 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_defines.h | 1289 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 470 +- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 9038 - drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h | 3859 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.c | 2353 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.h | 108 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.c | 1921 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.h | 84 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c| 1002 ++-- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.c | 387 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.h | 83 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.c | 860 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.h | 61 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_osdep.h | 56 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 115 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.c | 1932 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.h | 157 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_regs.h| 236 + 32 files changed, 18538 insertions(+), 13160 deletions(-) Is lots of little files really progress? -- Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, All, This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and separates e1000 hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an API that will allow us to continue to maintain the complex e1000 driver and add new hardware support to it without touching code that affects older chipsets. Thats good. but: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.c | 1077 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.h | 159 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_defines.h | 1289 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 470 +- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 9038 - drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h | 3859 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.c | 2353 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.h | 108 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.c | 1921 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.h | 84 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c| 1002 ++-- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.c | 387 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.h | 83 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.c | 860 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.h | 61 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_osdep.h | 56 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 115 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.c | 1932 +++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.h | 157 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_regs.h| 236 + 32 files changed, 18538 insertions(+), 13160 deletions(-) Is lots of little files really progress? I can think of a few files that we could merge myself, but we really wanted to get away from the two large (e1000_hw) files that we had, which was far worse. We're open to suggestions as to reduce the amount of files, but since e1000 has it's own subdirectory, and supports a large amount of files, I think we're in the right direction with the amount. We approached it this from a rather superfluous amount of files standpoint knowing we can merge some later anyway. One thing we've contemplated ourselves was to merge the smaller .h files into the .c files where applicable, so your comment goes duly noted Thanks, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. those are not in sync atm, but I'll get you one against Jeff's upstream tree, that'll take a minute, or five. Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 Perhaps the e1000_ prefix could be dropped as redundant? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:16:27 +0100 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 Perhaps the e1000_ prefix could be dropped as redundant? -- Yes, that suggestion would agree with what Linus told us about usb file names 7 years ago. (huh? that long?) --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:16:27 +0100 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 Perhaps the e1000_ prefix could be dropped as redundant? -- Yes, that suggestion would agree with what Linus told us about usb file names 7 years ago. (huh? that long?) You'll have to excuse me that I don't remember that anymore, but I'll note the suggestion and see what the team thinks. Thanks, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000 That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree? That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current Linus mainline would be preferred, please. Or on Jeff's netdev tree. An updated patch is available from git, and applies against netdev-2.6's upstream branch (as of commit 77aab8bf22042d1658d4adbca8b71779e7f2d0ff ) git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 e1000 Again, also available per http: http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/e1000_hw_init_layer_rewrite-v2-upstream.patch http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/e1000_hw_init_layer_rewrite-v2-upstream.patch.bz2 This version contains a few minor adjustments and updates to the one posted earlier this morning (and replaces that patch): 1) 82541 bitmask issue 2) 80003es2lan timeout value fix 3) added some more kdoc headers to functions 4) removed #ifdef NETIF_F_TSO6 forgotten by cleanup patch I hope this patch works for everyone, please let me know if there are still problems. Cheers, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
