Re: [PATCH 01/14] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property

2013-01-10 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/09/2013 01:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Andrew Murray 
> > 
> > DT bindings for PCI host bridges often use the ranges property to describe
> > memory and IO ranges - this binding tends to be the same across 
> > architectures
> > yet several parsing implementations exist, e.g. arch/mips/pci/pci.c,
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c and
> > arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c (clone of PPC). Some of these duplicate
> > functionality provided by drivers/of/address.c.
> > 
> > This patch provides a common iterator-based parser for the ranges property, 
> > it
> > is hoped this will reduce DT representation differences between 
> > architectures
> > and that architectures will migrate in part to this new parser.
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> 
> > +const __be32 *of_pci_process_ranges(struct device_node *node,
> 
> > +   while (from + np <= end) {
> > +   u64 cpu_addr, size;
> > +
> > +   cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, from + na);
> > +   size = of_read_number(from + na + pna, ns);
> > +   res->flags = bus->get_flags(from);
> > +   from += np;
> > +
> > +   if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
> > +   continue;
> 
> Hmmm. That seems to just ignore bad entries in the ranges property. Is
> that really the right thing to do? At least printing a diagnostic might
> be a good idea, even if the code does just soldier on in the hope
> everything still works.

That's true. However, erroring out here wouln't be useful either since a
NULL return value is used to mark the end of the iteration and the
caller would have to assume that no more ranges are present. Maybe
that's better than continuing anyway, even if a message is printed.

Alternatively, the of_pci_process_ranges() could be changed to return an
ERR_PTR() encoded errno. This is one case where it makes a lot of sense.
I have a feeling that Grant won't like that very much, though.

Another possibility would be to change away from an iterator-based
approach and return an integer for the number of ranges and negative
error code on failure while returning an allocated array of resources
through an output parameter.

Thierry


pgp8xVxoYUvnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH 01/14] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property

2013-01-10 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/09/2013 01:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Andrew Murray 
> 
> DT bindings for PCI host bridges often use the ranges property to describe
> memory and IO ranges - this binding tends to be the same across architectures
> yet several parsing implementations exist, e.g. arch/mips/pci/pci.c,
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c and
> arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c (clone of PPC). Some of these duplicate
> functionality provided by drivers/of/address.c.
> 
> This patch provides a common iterator-based parser for the ranges property, it
> is hoped this will reduce DT representation differences between architectures
> and that architectures will migrate in part to this new parser.
...

> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c

> +const __be32 *of_pci_process_ranges(struct device_node *node,

> + while (from + np <= end) {
> + u64 cpu_addr, size;
> +
> + cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, from + na);
> + size = of_read_number(from + na + pna, ns);
> + res->flags = bus->get_flags(from);
> + from += np;
> +
> + if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
> + continue;

Hmmm. That seems to just ignore bad entries in the ranges property. Is
that really the right thing to do? At least printing a diagnostic might
be a good idea, even if the code does just soldier on in the hope
everything still works.

> + res->name = node->full_name;
> + res->start = cpu_addr;
> + res->end = res->start + size - 1;
> + res->parent = res->child = res->sibling = NULL;
> + return from;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 01/14] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property

2013-01-10 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/09/2013 01:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
 From: Andrew Murray andrew.mur...@arm.com
 
 DT bindings for PCI host bridges often use the ranges property to describe
 memory and IO ranges - this binding tends to be the same across architectures
 yet several parsing implementations exist, e.g. arch/mips/pci/pci.c,
 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c and
 arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c (clone of PPC). Some of these duplicate
 functionality provided by drivers/of/address.c.
 
 This patch provides a common iterator-based parser for the ranges property, it
 is hoped this will reduce DT representation differences between architectures
 and that architectures will migrate in part to this new parser.
...

 diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c

 +const __be32 *of_pci_process_ranges(struct device_node *node,

 + while (from + np = end) {
 + u64 cpu_addr, size;
 +
 + cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, from + na);
 + size = of_read_number(from + na + pna, ns);
 + res-flags = bus-get_flags(from);
 + from += np;
 +
 + if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
 + continue;

Hmmm. That seems to just ignore bad entries in the ranges property. Is
that really the right thing to do? At least printing a diagnostic might
be a good idea, even if the code does just soldier on in the hope
everything still works.

 + res-name = node-full_name;
 + res-start = cpu_addr;
 + res-end = res-start + size - 1;
 + res-parent = res-child = res-sibling = NULL;
 + return from;
 + }
 +
 + return NULL;
 +}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 01/14] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property

2013-01-10 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
 On 01/09/2013 01:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
  From: Andrew Murray andrew.mur...@arm.com
  
  DT bindings for PCI host bridges often use the ranges property to describe
  memory and IO ranges - this binding tends to be the same across 
  architectures
  yet several parsing implementations exist, e.g. arch/mips/pci/pci.c,
  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c and
  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c (clone of PPC). Some of these duplicate
  functionality provided by drivers/of/address.c.
  
  This patch provides a common iterator-based parser for the ranges property, 
  it
  is hoped this will reduce DT representation differences between 
  architectures
  and that architectures will migrate in part to this new parser.
 ...
 
  diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
 
  +const __be32 *of_pci_process_ranges(struct device_node *node,
 
  +   while (from + np = end) {
  +   u64 cpu_addr, size;
  +
  +   cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, from + na);
  +   size = of_read_number(from + na + pna, ns);
  +   res-flags = bus-get_flags(from);
  +   from += np;
  +
  +   if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
  +   continue;
 
 Hmmm. That seems to just ignore bad entries in the ranges property. Is
 that really the right thing to do? At least printing a diagnostic might
 be a good idea, even if the code does just soldier on in the hope
 everything still works.

That's true. However, erroring out here wouln't be useful either since a
NULL return value is used to mark the end of the iteration and the
caller would have to assume that no more ranges are present. Maybe
that's better than continuing anyway, even if a message is printed.

Alternatively, the of_pci_process_ranges() could be changed to return an
ERR_PTR() encoded errno. This is one case where it makes a lot of sense.
I have a feeling that Grant won't like that very much, though.

Another possibility would be to change away from an iterator-based
approach and return an integer for the number of ranges and negative
error code on failure while returning an allocated array of resources
through an output parameter.

Thierry


pgp8xVxoYUvnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature