Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:54:30AM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > Would this official mm tree work? > > T: git git://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm.git > > If not, I am OK with either vfs tree or a dedicated tree. That is a constantly rebased tree, so I don't think it helps.
Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:34 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when > > > open coding the function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me. > > > > How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems? > > Good question as there is no really applicable tree. One option > would the vfs tree as it toucheѕ some VFS stuff, and the follow on > series that depends on it is all about VFS bits. Alternatively I > could set up a tree just for these bits. The important bit is that > it doesn't go into the -mm tree as the usual catchall, as I have > more stuff that depends on it and requires a git tree. Would this official mm tree work? T: git git://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm.git If not, I am OK with either vfs tree or a dedicated tree. Thanks, Song
Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when > > open coding the function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me. > > How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems? Good question as there is no really applicable tree. One option would the vfs tree as it toucheѕ some VFS stuff, and the follow on series that depends on it is all about VFS bits. Alternatively I could set up a tree just for these bits. The important bit is that it doesn't go into the -mm tree as the usual catchall, as I have more stuff that depends on it and requires a git tree.
Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper
Hi Christoph, On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when > open coding the function. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me. How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems? Thanks, Song