Re: [PATCH 01/19] sched/numa: Remove redundant field.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:30:10PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > numa_entry is a list_head defined in task_struct, but never used. > > No functional change > > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
Re: [PATCH 01/19] sched/numa: Remove redundant field.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:30:10PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > numa_entry is a list_head defined in task_struct, but never used. > > No functional change > > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
Re: [PATCH 01/19] sched/numa: Remove redundant field.
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 15:30 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > numa_entry is a list_head defined in task_struct, but never used. > > No functional change > > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju I guess we stopped using that when we figured out there was no need to iterate over the tasks in a numa group. Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All Rights Reversed. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH 01/19] sched/numa: Remove redundant field.
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 15:30 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > numa_entry is a list_head defined in task_struct, but never used. > > No functional change > > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju I guess we stopped using that when we figured out there was no need to iterate over the tasks in a numa group. Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All Rights Reversed. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
