RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Koul, Vinod
> > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his
> > > latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> > >
> > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on
> > > that work, so we are running out of time now.
> >
> > Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
> >
> 
> Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
If you have any patches for this, please send me. Your work should not stall,
that is why I had the topic branch.

I plan to merge this to my next mid next week,
based on how early my travel permits :)

--
~Vinod
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+{zX����ܨ}���Ơz�:+v���zZ+��+zf���h���~i���z��w���?�&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 November 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> > his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> > 
> > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> > on that work, so we are running out of time now.
> 
> Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
> 

Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Jon Hunter

On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
 UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
 call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
 The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.

 Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 
>>>
>>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
>>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
>>> 3.8.
>>
>> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>>
> 
> Vinod,
> 
> is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
> 
> I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> on that work, so we are running out of time now.

Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].

Jon

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 
> > 
> > What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> > it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> > 3.8.
> 
> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
> 
> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
> 

Vinod,

is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?

I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
on that work, so we are running out of time now.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
 On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
 
  On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
   UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
   call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
   The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
   
   Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
  
  Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
  
  What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
  it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
  3.8.
 
 It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
 
 Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
 

Vinod,

is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?

I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
on that work, so we are running out of time now.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Jon Hunter

On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
 On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
 On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

 On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
 UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
 call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
 The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.

 Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org

 Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de

 What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
 it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
 3.8.

 It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.

 Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)

 
 Vinod,
 
 is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
 his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
 
 I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
 on that work, so we are running out of time now.

Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].

Jon

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 November 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
  is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
  his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
  
  I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
  on that work, so we are running out of time now.
 
 Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
 

Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-16 Thread Koul, Vinod
   is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his
   latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
  
   I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on
   that work, so we are running out of time now.
 
  Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
 
 
 Ok, very good. Thanks everyone!
If you have any patches for this, please send me. Your work should not stall,
that is why I had the topic branch.

I plan to merge this to my next mid next week,
based on how early my travel permits :)

--
~Vinod
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+{zX����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v���zZ+��+zf���h���~i���z��w���?��)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones  wrote:

> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 

Acked-by: Linus Walleij 

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 
> 
> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
> 3.8.

It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.

Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 

What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
3.8.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
 UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
 call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
 The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
 
 Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de

What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
3.8.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

 On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
  UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
  call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
  The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
  
  Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
 
 Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
 
 What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
 it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
 3.8.

It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.

Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately

2012-11-15 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:

 UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
 call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
 The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.

 Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org

Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/