Re: [PATCH 1/6 v9] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On Friday 07 December 2012 04:12 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: From: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf --- Changes from v4, v5, v6, v7, v8 None. Changes from v3 No longer setting *clk to NULL in twd_get_clock(). Changes from v2 Turned the check for the node pointer into an if-then-else statement. Removed the second, redundant clk_get_rate. Changes from v1 None. arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Hi Mark, What is the status of this patch? Regards, PrashantG diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c index b22d700..af46b80 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c @@ -237,12 +237,15 @@ static irqreturn_t twd_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) return IRQ_NONE; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/6 v9] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On Friday 07 December 2012 04:12 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf mark.langsd...@calxeda.com --- Changes from v4, v5, v6, v7, v8 None. Changes from v3 No longer setting *clk to NULL in twd_get_clock(). Changes from v2 Turned the check for the node pointer into an if-then-else statement. Removed the second, redundant clk_get_rate. Changes from v1 None. arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Hi Mark, What is the status of this patch? Regards, PrashantG diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c index b22d700..af46b80 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c @@ -237,12 +237,15 @@ static irqreturn_t twd_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) return IRQ_NONE; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/6 v9] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf > --- > Changes from v4, v5, v6, v7, v8 Why you keep sending these emails without real changes? Is this a rebase process or what? I saw at least two other emails where you do the same thing. Thank you! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/6 v9] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Mark Langsdorf mark.langsd...@calxeda.com wrote: From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf mark.langsd...@calxeda.com --- Changes from v4, v5, v6, v7, v8 Why you keep sending these emails without real changes? Is this a rebase process or what? I saw at least two other emails where you do the same thing. Thank you! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
