Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
* H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I would like to strongly request one addition, however: please make it > so that a subarchitecture which is still a hardware architecture doesn't > have to redefine all of these every time. Yep, that's done. As long as the defaults are ok, the subarch doesn't need to override them. So I think that request is met. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
* H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I would like to strongly request one addition, however: please make it so that a subarchitecture which is still a hardware architecture doesn't have to redefine all of these every time. Yep, that's done. As long as the defaults are ok, the subarch doesn't need to override them. So I think that request is met. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
Chris Wright wrote: * Zachary Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i386 Transparent Paravirtualization Subarch Patch #1 This change encapsulates MSR register accessors and moves them into the sub-architecture layer. The goal is a clean, uniform interface that may be redefined on new sub-architectures of i386. I currently have nothing analgous for Xen, but this one looks sane. I would like to strongly request one addition, however: please make it so that a subarchitecture which is still a hardware architecture doesn't have to redefine all of these every time. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
* Zachary Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i386 Transparent Paravirtualization Subarch Patch #1 > > This change encapsulates MSR register accessors and moves them into the > sub-architecture layer. The goal is a clean, uniform interface that may > be redefined on new sub-architectures of i386. I currently have nothing analgous for Xen, but this one looks sane. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
* Zachary Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i386 Transparent Paravirtualization Subarch Patch #1 This change encapsulates MSR register accessors and moves them into the sub-architecture layer. The goal is a clean, uniform interface that may be redefined on new sub-architectures of i386. I currently have nothing analgous for Xen, but this one looks sane. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
Chris Wright wrote: * Zachary Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i386 Transparent Paravirtualization Subarch Patch #1 This change encapsulates MSR register accessors and moves them into the sub-architecture layer. The goal is a clean, uniform interface that may be redefined on new sub-architectures of i386. I currently have nothing analgous for Xen, but this one looks sane. I would like to strongly request one addition, however: please make it so that a subarchitecture which is still a hardware architecture doesn't have to redefine all of these every time. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
