Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On 2015/1/19 16:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2015 11:17:02 Yijing Wang wrote: >> On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( + struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + host->of_scan = true; +} >>> >>> I probably missed something here, but where does host->of_scan >>> get used? >>> >> >> It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed >> in patch 11. > > Ok, I see it now. > >> @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( >> pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host->busnum, 255); >> } >> >> -max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); >> +if (host->ops && host->ops->phb_probe_mode) >> +host->ops->phb_probe_mode(host); >> >> -if (!found) >> -pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); >> +if (host->of_scan) { >> +if (host->ops &>ops->phb_of_scan_bus) >> +host->ops->phb_of_scan_bus(host); >> +} else { >> +max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); >> +if (!found) >> +pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); >> +} >> > > I think we can simplify this based on the knowledge that this code > will remain powerpc specific. How about removing the phb_probe_mode() > callback and replacing it with just a phb_scan_bus() callback that > will always get set on sparc, and do this on powerpc: > > +static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host) > +{ > + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL; > + struct pci_bus *bus = host->bus; > + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(>dev); > + > + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */ > + if (hose->dn && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode) > + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus); > + > + pr_debug("probe mode: %d\n", mode); > + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE) { > + of_scan_bus(host->dn, bus); > + return max; // XXX need to get this from somewhere > + } > + return pci_scan_child_bus(b); > +} > > Would that work? This looks good to me, it is more simple. Thanks! Yijing. > Arnd > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On Monday 19 January 2015 11:17:02 Yijing Wang wrote: > On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: > >> +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( > >> + struct pci_host_bridge *host) > >> +{ > >> + host->of_scan = true; > >> +} > >> > > > > I probably missed something here, but where does host->of_scan > > get used? > > > > It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed > in patch 11. Ok, I see it now. > @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( > pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host->busnum, 255); > } > > - max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); > + if (host->ops && host->ops->phb_probe_mode) > + host->ops->phb_probe_mode(host); > > - if (!found) > - pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); > + if (host->of_scan) { > + if (host->ops &>ops->phb_of_scan_bus) > + host->ops->phb_of_scan_bus(host); > + } else { > + max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); > + if (!found) > + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); > + } > I think we can simplify this based on the knowledge that this code will remain powerpc specific. How about removing the phb_probe_mode() callback and replacing it with just a phb_scan_bus() callback that will always get set on sparc, and do this on powerpc: +static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL; + struct pci_bus *bus = host->bus; + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(>dev); + + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */ + if (hose->dn && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode) + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus); + + pr_debug("probe mode: %d\n", mode); + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE) { + of_scan_bus(host->dn, bus); + return max; // XXX need to get this from somewhere + } + return pci_scan_child_bus(b); +} Would that work? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On Monday 19 January 2015 11:17:02 Yijing Wang wrote: On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( + struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + host-of_scan = true; +} I probably missed something here, but where does host-of_scan get used? It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed in patch 11. Ok, I see it now. @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host-busnum, 255); } - max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (host-ops host-ops-phb_probe_mode) + host-ops-phb_probe_mode(host); - if (!found) - pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + if (host-of_scan) { + if (host-ops host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus) + host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus(host); + } else { + max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (!found) + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + } I think we can simplify this based on the knowledge that this code will remain powerpc specific. How about removing the phb_probe_mode() callback and replacing it with just a phb_scan_bus() callback that will always get set on sparc, and do this on powerpc: +static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL; + struct pci_bus *bus = host-bus; + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(host-dev); + + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */ + if (hose-dn ppc_md.pci_probe_mode) + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus); + + pr_debug(probe mode: %d\n, mode); + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE) { + of_scan_bus(host-dn, bus); + return max; // XXX need to get this from somewhere + } + return pci_scan_child_bus(b); +} Would that work? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On 2015/1/19 16:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 19 January 2015 11:17:02 Yijing Wang wrote: On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( + struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + host-of_scan = true; +} I probably missed something here, but where does host-of_scan get used? It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed in patch 11. Ok, I see it now. @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host-busnum, 255); } -max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); +if (host-ops host-ops-phb_probe_mode) +host-ops-phb_probe_mode(host); -if (!found) -pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); +if (host-of_scan) { +if (host-ops host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus) +host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus(host); +} else { +max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); +if (!found) +pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); +} I think we can simplify this based on the knowledge that this code will remain powerpc specific. How about removing the phb_probe_mode() callback and replacing it with just a phb_scan_bus() callback that will always get set on sparc, and do this on powerpc: +static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL; + struct pci_bus *bus = host-bus; + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(host-dev); + + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */ + if (hose-dn ppc_md.pci_probe_mode) + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus); + + pr_debug(probe mode: %d\n, mode); + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE) { + of_scan_bus(host-dn, bus); + return max; // XXX need to get this from somewhere + } + return pci_scan_child_bus(b); +} Would that work? This looks good to me, it is more simple. Thanks! Yijing. Arnd . -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: >> +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( >> + struct pci_host_bridge *host) >> +{ >> + host->of_scan = true; >> +} >> > > I probably missed something here, but where does host->of_scan > get used? > It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed in patch 11. @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host->busnum, 255); } - max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (host->ops && host->ops->phb_probe_mode) + host->ops->phb_probe_mode(host); - if (!found) - pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + if (host->of_scan) { + if (host->ops &>ops->phb_of_scan_bus) + host->ops->phb_of_scan_bus(host); + } else { + max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (!found) + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + } return b; Thanks! Yijing. > Arnd > > ___ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On 2015/1/16 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( + struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + host-of_scan = true; +} I probably missed something here, but where does host-of_scan get used? It is used in __pci_scan_root_bus() to detect whether of scan bus is needed in patch 11. @@ -2051,10 +2053,17 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus( pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, host-busnum, 255); } - max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (host-ops host-ops-phb_probe_mode) + host-ops-phb_probe_mode(host); - if (!found) - pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + if (host-of_scan) { + if (host-ops host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus) + host-ops-phb_of_scan_bus(host); + } else { + max = pci_scan_child_bus(b); + if (!found) + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max); + } return b; Thanks! Yijing. Arnd ___ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel . -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: > +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( > + struct pci_host_bridge *host) > +{ > + host->of_scan = true; > +} > I probably missed something here, but where does host->of_scan get used? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 18/28] PCI/sparc: Use pci_scan_root_bridge() for simplicity
On Friday 16 January 2015 09:44:16 Yijing Wang wrote: +static void pci_host_bridge_probe_mode( + struct pci_host_bridge *host) +{ + host-of_scan = true; +} I probably missed something here, but where does host-of_scan get used? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/