Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF

2020-12-31 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 30 December 2020 19:12:40 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 06:27:07PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:06:52 +0100
> > Pali Rohár  wrote:
> > 
> > >   if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
> > >   (memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "UBNT", 16) ||
> > >memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT  ", 16)))
> > 
> > I would rather add a quirk member (bitfield) to the sfp structure and do
> > something like this
> > 
> > if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
> > !(sfp->quirks & SFP_QUIRK_BAD_PHYS_ID))
> > 
> > or maybe put this check into the module_supported method.
> 
> Sorry, definitely not. If you've ever looked at the SDHCI driver with
> its multiple "quirks" bitfields, doing this is a recipe for creating
> a very horrid hard to understand mess.
> 
> What you suggest just results in yet more complexity.

Should I rather put this vendor name/pn check into the
sfp_module_supported() function?

static bool sfp_module_supported(const struct sfp_eeprom_id *id)
{
if (id->base.phys_id == SFF8024_ID_SFP &&
id->base.phys_ext_id == SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP)
return true;

if (id->base.phys_id == SFF8024_ID_SFF_8472 &&
id->base.phys_ext_id == SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP &&
!memcmp(id->base.vendor_name, "UBNT", 16) &&
!memcmp(id->base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT  ", 16))
return true;

return false;
}


Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF

2020-12-30 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 06:27:07PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:06:52 +0100
> Pali Rohár  wrote:
> 
> > if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
> > (memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "UBNT", 16) ||
> >  memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT  ", 16)))
> 
> I would rather add a quirk member (bitfield) to the sfp structure and do
> something like this
> 
> if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
> !(sfp->quirks & SFP_QUIRK_BAD_PHYS_ID))
> 
> or maybe put this check into the module_supported method.

Sorry, definitely not. If you've ever looked at the SDHCI driver with
its multiple "quirks" bitfields, doing this is a recipe for creating
a very horrid hard to understand mess.

What you suggest just results in yet more complexity.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!


Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF

2020-12-30 Thread Marek Behún
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:06:52 +0100
Pali Rohár  wrote:

>   if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
>   (memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "UBNT", 16) ||
>memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT  ", 16)))

I would rather add a quirk member (bitfield) to the sfp structure and do
something like this

if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
!(sfp->quirks & SFP_QUIRK_BAD_PHYS_ID))

or maybe put this check into the module_supported method.

Marek


Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF

2020-12-30 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 30 December 2020 16:11:51 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 04:47:53PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Some GPON SFP modules (e.g. Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant) have set SFF phys_id
> > in their EEPROM. Kernel SFP subsystem currently does not allow to use
> > modules detected as SFF.
> > 
> > This change extends check for SFP modules so also those with SFF phys_id
> > are allowed. With this change also GPON SFP module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant
> > is recognized.
> 
> I really don't want to do this for every single module out there.
> It's likely that Ubiquiti do this crap as a vendor lock-in measure.
> Let's make it specific to Ubiquiti modules _only_ until such time
> that we know better.

Ok. This module_supported() function is called in sfp_sm_mod_probe()
function. Current code is:

/* Check whether we support this module */
if (!sfp->type->module_supported()) {
dev_err(sfp->dev,
"module is not supported - phys id 0x%02x 0x%02x\n",
sfp->id.base.phys_id, sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id);
return -EINVAL;
}

Do you want to change code to something like this?

/* Check whether we support this module */
if (!sfp->type->module_supported() &&
(memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "UBNT", 16) ||
 memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT  ", 16)))
dev_err(sfp->dev,
"module is not supported - phys id 0x%02x 0x%02x\n",
sfp->id.base.phys_id, sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id);
return -EINVAL;
}

Or do you have a better idea how to skip that module_supported check for
this UBNT SFP?


Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF

2020-12-30 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 04:47:53PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Some GPON SFP modules (e.g. Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant) have set SFF phys_id
> in their EEPROM. Kernel SFP subsystem currently does not allow to use
> modules detected as SFF.
> 
> This change extends check for SFP modules so also those with SFF phys_id
> are allowed. With this change also GPON SFP module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant
> is recognized.

I really don't want to do this for every single module out there.
It's likely that Ubiquiti do this crap as a vendor lock-in measure.
Let's make it specific to Ubiquiti modules _only_ until such time
that we know better.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!