Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:39:50PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > Hello, > > could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include > 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check > ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. I am also queuing this for the 3.11 kernel. Thanks! Cheers, -- Luis > Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. > More information is in bugzilla[2]. > > Thanks. > > > --- > 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg99343.html > 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055872 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:39:50PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: Hello, could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. I am also queuing this for the 3.11 kernel. Thanks! Cheers, -- Luis Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. More information is in bugzilla[2]. Thanks. --- 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg99343.html 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055872 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe stable in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
At Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:06:37 -0800,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release.
> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
I reviewed the following patches and they look good to me.
> Geert Uytterhoeven
> mm: Make {,set}page_address() static inline if WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
...
> Eric W. Biederman
> vfs: In d_path don't call d_dname on a mount point
This kernel also passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- memory: 8GB
- Test Target Environment:
- Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
- # of vCPU: 2
- memory: 2GB
Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
At Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:06:37 -0800,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release.
There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
I reviewed the following patches and they look good to me.
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
mm: Make {,set}page_address() static inline if WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
...
Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com
vfs: In d_path don't call d_dname on a mount point
This kernel also passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- memory: 8GB
- Test Target Environment:
- Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
- # of vCPU: 2
- memory: 2GB
Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:39:50PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > Hello, > > could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include > 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check > ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. I'll queue it up for the next round of stable kernels, thanks. > Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. Yes, no one marked it for the stable tree :( thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
Hello, could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. More information is in bugzilla[2]. Thanks. --- 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg99343.html 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055872 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On 01/23/2014 12:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.9-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Patch testing - passed Compile testing - passed Boot testing - passed dmesg regression testing - passed - no regressions in emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On 01/23/2014 12:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.9-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Patch testing - passed Compile testing - passed Boot testing - passed dmesg regression testing - passed - no regressions in emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
Hello, could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. More information is in bugzilla[2]. Thanks. --- 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg99343.html 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055872 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:39:50PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: Hello, could 3.12.9 and 3.10.28 include 0dce7cd kvm: x86: fix apic_base enable check ? It fixes a regression applied to 3.10.26 and 3.12.7. I'll queue it up for the next round of stable kernels, thanks. Stable was mentioned on kvm-list[1], but it might have been forgotten. Yes, no one marked it for the stable tree :( thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On 01/23/2014 08:11 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test looks good: total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. It's broken? I thought it had been building fine for a while now? In mainline, yes. Or at least it was when I dropped it, and I gave up on it. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. > > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > Build test looks good: > total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 > > Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped > arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously > broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. It's broken? I thought it had been building fine for a while now? Anyway, thanks for testing, whatever ARM build tests you enable is fine with me. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build test looks good: total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. qemu tests all passed. Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test looks good: total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. qemu tests all passed. Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test looks good: total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. It's broken? I thought it had been building fine for a while now? Anyway, thanks for testing, whatever ARM build tests you enable is fine with me. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review
On 01/23/2014 08:11 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:20:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.9 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat Jan 25 19:06:36 UTC 2014. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test looks good: total: 126 pass: 121 skipped: 5 fail: 0 Note that I added several individual build tests for arm but dropped arm:allmodconfig. Background is that arm:allmodconfig is quite notoriously broken nowadays, and it doesn't make much sense to keep testing it. It's broken? I thought it had been building fine for a while now? In mainline, yes. Or at least it was when I dropped it, and I gave up on it. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
