Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/17/2016, 04:23 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/16/2016 11:16 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are >>> only 53 >>> patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change >>> that. >>> Any idea what might cause that ? >>> >>> I am picking up the changes from >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, >>> >>> branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? >> >> Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. >> > > Now the build reference is v3.12.56-62-gceed939, but everything still > builds fine, > so we should be ok. Nice, thanks! -- js suse labs
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/17/2016, 04:23 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/16/2016 11:16 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are >>> only 53 >>> patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change >>> that. >>> Any idea what might cause that ? >>> >>> I am picking up the changes from >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, >>> >>> branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? >> >> Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. >> > > Now the build reference is v3.12.56-62-gceed939, but everything still > builds fine, > so we should be ok. Nice, thanks! -- js suse labs
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 > patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. > Any idea what might cause that ? > > I am picking up the changes from > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, > branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. thanks, -- js suse labs
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 > patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. > Any idea what might cause that ? > > I am picking up the changes from > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, > branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. thanks, -- js suse labs
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016 11:16 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. Any idea what might cause that ? I am picking up the changes from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. Now the build reference is v3.12.56-62-gceed939, but everything still builds fine, so we should be ok. Thanks, Guenter
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016 11:16 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 03/16/2016, 06:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. Any idea what might cause that ? I am picking up the changes from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Oops, I forgot to push the qeueu, sorry. Now fixed. Now the build reference is v3.12.56-62-gceed939, but everything still builds fine, so we should be ok. Thanks, Guenter
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 124 pass: 124 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 79 pass: 79 fail: 0 Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. Any idea what might cause that ? I am picking up the changes from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Thanks, Guenter
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 124 pass: 124 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 79 pass: 79 fail: 0 Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. One oddity: My build points to v3.12.56-53-g4eb8683, ie there are only 53 patches, not 58, in my build. A manual branch update did not change that. Any idea what might cause that ? I am picking up the changes from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git, branch stable-3.12-queue. Is that still correct ? Thanks, Guenter
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016 04:58 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jirislaby/stable-review/patch-3.12.57-rc1.xz > and the diffstat can be found below. > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions, thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016 04:58 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jirislaby/stable-review/patch-3.12.57-rc1.xz > and the diffstat can be found below. > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions, thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016, 04:41 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 03/16/2016 04:58 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. >> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> >> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jirislaby/stable-review/patch-3.12.57-rc1.xz >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions, Great, thanks! -- js suse labs
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/58] 3.12.57-stable review
On 03/16/2016, 04:41 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 03/16/2016 04:58 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.57 release. >> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Fri Mar 18 10:38:57 CET 2016. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> >> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jirislaby/stable-review/patch-3.12.57-rc1.xz >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions, Great, thanks! -- js suse labs
