Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 09:26 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:11:30 +0100, > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.66 release. > > There are 27 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Dec 31 12:00:00 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > This kernel passed my test. > > - Test Cases: >- Build this kernel. >- Boot this kernel. >- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. > > - Test Tool: >https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable > > - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): >http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/- datetime>.tar.xz > > - Build Environment: >- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 >- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 >- memory: 8GB > > - Test Target Environment: >- Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment) >- # of vCPU: 2 >- memory: 2GB Thanks for testing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review
At Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:11:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.66 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed Dec 31 12:00:00 UTC 2014. > Anything received after that time might be too late. This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - memory: 8GB - Test Target Environment: - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment) - # of vCPU: 2 - memory: 2GB Thanks, Satoru > > A combined patch relative to 3.2.65 will be posted as an additional > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below. > > Ben. > > - > > Al Viro (2): > deal with deadlock in d_walk() > [ca5358ef75fc69fee5322a38a340f5739d997c10] > move d_rcu from overlapping d_child to overlapping d_alias > [946e51f2bf37f1656916eb75bd0742ba33983c28] > > Anatol Pomozov (1): > ext4: make orphan functions be no-op in no-journal mode > [c9b92530a723ac5ef8e352885a1862b18f31b2f5] > > Andy Lutomirski (2): > x86, kvm: Clear paravirt_enabled on KVM guests for espfix32's benefit > [29fa6825463c97e5157284db80107d1bfac5d77b] > x86/tls: Validate TLS entries to protect espfix > [41bdc78544b8a93a9c6814b8bbbfef966272abbe] > > Ard Biesheuvel (1): > crypto: ghash-clmulni-intel - use C implementation for setkey() > [8ceee72808d1ae3fb191284afc2257a2be964725] > > Ben Hutchings (2): > drivers/net, ipv6: Select IPv6 fragment idents for virtio UFO packets > [5188cd44c55db3e92cd9e77a40b5baa7ed4340f7] > drivers/net: macvtap and tun depend on INET > [de11b0e8c569b96c2cf6a811e3805b7aeef498a3] > > Dan Carpenter (1): > [media] ttusb-dec: buffer overflow in ioctl > [f2e323ec96077642d397bb1c355def536d489d16] > > Daniel Borkmann (3): > net: sctp: fix NULL pointer dereference in af->from_addr_param on > malformed packet > [e40607cbe270a9e8360907cb1e62ddf0736e4864] > net: sctp: fix memory leak in auth key management > [4184b2a79a7612a9272ce20d639934584a1f3786] > net: sctp: use MAX_HEADER for headroom reserve in output path > [9772b54c55266ce80c639a80aa68eeb908f8ecf5] > > Daniel Vetter (1): > drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled > [b0616c5306b342ceca07044dbc4f917d95c4f825] > > David Herrmann (1): > drm: fix DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETFB handle-leak > [101b96f32956ee99bf1468afaf572b88cda9f88b] > > Devin Ryles (1): > AHCI: Add DeviceIDs for Sunrise Point-LP SATA controller > [249cd0a187ed4ef1d0af7f74362cc2791ec5581b] > > Dmitry Torokhov (1): > sata_fsl: fix error handling of irq_of_parse_and_map > [aad0b624129709c94c2e19e583b6053520353fa8] > > Eric Dumazet (2): > tcp: md5: do not use alloc_percpu() > [349ce993ac706869d553a1816426d3a4bfda02b1] > tcp: md5: remove spinlock usage in fast path > [71cea17ed39fdf1c0634f530ddc6a2c2fc601c2b] > > Grygorii Strashko (1): > i2c: davinci: generate STP always when NACK is received > [9ea359f7314132cbcb5a502d2d8ef095be1f45e4] > > Hugh Dickins (1): > mm: fix swapoff hang after page migration and fork > [2022b4d18a491a578218ce7a4eca8666db895a73] > > Jan Kara (1): > udf: Avoid infinite loop when processing indirect ICBs > [c03aa9f6e1f938618e6db2e23afef0574efeeb65] > > Jiri Pirko (1): > ipv4: fix nexthop attlen check in fib_nh_match > [f76936d07c4eeb36d8dbb64ebd30ab46ff85d9f7] > > Martin Schwidefsky (1): > s390,time: revert direct ktime path for s390 clockevent device > [8adbf78ec4839c1dc4ff20c9a1f332a7bc99e6e6] > > Nadav Amit (1): > KVM: x86: Don't report guest userspace emulation error to userspace > [a2b9e6c1a35afcc0973acb72e591c714e78885ff] > > Paolo Bonzini (1): > x86: kvm: use alternatives for VMCALL vs. VMMCALL if kernel text is > read-only > [c1118b3602c2329671ad5ec8bdf8e374323d6343] > > Tejun Heo (1): > ahci: disable MSI on SAMSUNG 0xa800 SSD > [2b21ef0aae65f22f5ba86b13c4588f6f0c2dbefb] > > Vasily Averin (1): > ipv4: dst_entry leak in ip_send_unicast_reply() > [4062090e3e5caaf55bed4523a69f26c3265cc1d2] > > Makefile | 4 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c | 4 +- > arch/s390/kernel/time.c| 1
Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 01:39 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:11:30AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.66 release. > > There are 27 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Dec 31 12:00:00 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > Build results: > total: 111 pass: 108 fail: 3 > Failed builds: > mips:allmodconfig > xtensa:defconfig > xtensa:allmodconfig So, nothing new there. > Qemu tests: > total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0 > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:11:30AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.66 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed Dec 31 12:00:00 UTC 2014. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 111 pass: 108 fail: 3 Failed builds: mips:allmodconfig xtensa:defconfig xtensa:allmodconfig Qemu tests: total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0 Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review
This is the combined patch for 3.2.66-rc1 relative to 3.2.65.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1433109..cda7e1d 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
VERSION = 3
PATCHLEVEL = 2
-SUBLEVEL = 65
-EXTRAVERSION =
+SUBLEVEL = 66
+EXTRAVERSION = -rc1
NAME = Saber-toothed Squirrel
# *DOCUMENTATION*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
index 70ec4e9..941d5cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void spufs_prune_dir(struct dentry *dir)
struct dentry *dentry, *tmp;
mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &dir->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &dir->d_subdirs, d_child) {
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (!(d_unhashed(dentry)) && dentry->d_inode) {
dget_dlock(dentry);
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ out:
* - free child's inode if possible
* - free child
*/
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &dir->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(dentry, tmp, &dir->d_subdirs, d_child) {
dput(dentry);
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
index b2f44de..fd65e5e2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
@@ -110,20 +110,10 @@ static void fixup_clock_comparator(unsigned long long delta)
set_clock_comparator(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator);
}
-static int s390_next_ktime(ktime_t expires,
+static int s390_next_event(unsigned long delta,
struct clock_event_device *evt)
{
- struct timespec ts;
- u64 nsecs;
-
- ts.tv_sec = ts.tv_nsec = 0;
- monotonic_to_bootbased(&ts);
- nsecs = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(timespec_to_ktime(ts), expires));
- do_div(nsecs, 125);
- S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = sched_clock_base_cc + (nsecs << 9);
- /* Program the maximum value if we have an overflow (== year 2042) */
- if (unlikely(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator < sched_clock_base_cc))
- S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = -1ULL;
+ S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = get_clock() + delta;
set_clock_comparator(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator);
return 0;
}
@@ -148,15 +138,14 @@ void init_cpu_timer(void)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
cd = &per_cpu(comparators, cpu);
cd->name = "comparator";
- cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT |
- CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_KTIME;
+ cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
cd->mult = 16777;
cd->shift = 12;
cd->min_delta_ns = 1;
cd->max_delta_ns = LONG_MAX;
cd->rating = 400;
cd->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
- cd->set_next_ktime = s390_next_ktime;
+ cd->set_next_event = s390_next_event;
cd->set_mode = s390_set_mode;
clockevents_register_device(cd);
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
index 1eb7f90..eb4d2a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
@@ -24,10 +24,6 @@
.align 16
.Lbswap_mask:
.octa 0x000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f
-.Lpoly:
- .octa 0xc201
-.Ltwo_one:
- .octa 0x00010001
#define DATA %xmm0
#define SHASH %xmm1
@@ -131,27 +127,3 @@ ENTRY(clmul_ghash_update)
movups DATA, (%rdi)
.Lupdate_just_ret:
ret
-
-/*
- * void clmul_ghash_setkey(be128 *shash, const u8 *key);
- *
- * Calculate hash_key << 1 mod poly
- */
-ENTRY(clmul_ghash_setkey)
- movaps .Lbswap_mask, BSWAP
- movups (%rsi), %xmm0
- PSHUFB_XMM BSWAP %xmm0
- movaps %xmm0, %xmm1
- psllq $1, %xmm0
- psrlq $63, %xmm1
- movaps %xmm1, %xmm2
- pslldq $8, %xmm1
- psrldq $8, %xmm2
- por %xmm1, %xmm0
- # reduction
- pshufd $0b00100100, %xmm2, %xmm1
- pcmpeqd .Ltwo_one, %xmm1
- pand .Lpoly, %xmm1
- pxor %xmm1, %xmm0
- movups %xmm0, (%rdi)
- ret
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
index 976aa64..294a264 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ void clmul_ghash_mul(char *dst, const be128 *shash);
void clmul_ghash_update(char *dst, const char *src, unsigned int srclen,
const be128 *shash);
-void clmul_ghash_setkey(be128 *shash, const u8 *key);
-
struct ghash_async_ctx {
struct cryptd_ahash *cryptd_tfm;
};
@@ -57,13 +55,23 @@ static int ghash_setkey(struct crypto_shash *tfm,
const u8 *key, unsigned int keylen)
{
struct ghash_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(tfm);
+ be128 *x = (be128 *)key;
+ u64 a, b;
if (keylen != GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE) {
crypto_shash_set_flags(tfm, CRYPTO_TFM_RES_BAD_KEY_LEN);
return -EINVAL;
}
- clmul_ghash_setkey(&ctx->shash, key);
+ /* perform multiplication by 'x' in GF(2^128) */
+ a = be64_to_cpu(x->a);
+ b = be64_to_cpu(x->b);
+
+ ctx->shash.a = (__be64)((b << 1) | (a >> 63));
+ ctx->shash.b = (__be64)((a << 1) | (b >> 63));
+
+ if (a >> 63)
+ ctx->shash.b ^= cpu_
