Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string
From: Julia Lawall Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:20:46 +0100 > The function name contains cleanup, not clean. > > This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance, > as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes. > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:20:46 +0100 The function name contains cleanup, not clean. This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance, as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The function name contains cleanup, not clean.
>
> This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance,
> as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
Thanks - seems like a obvious mistake.
Acked-by: Grant Grundler
>
> ---
> The semantic patch is difficult to summarize, but is available in the cover
> letter of this patch series.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> index c820560..50a0077 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static int __init dmfe_init_module(void)
>
> static void __exit dmfe_cleanup_module(void)
> {
> - DMFE_DBUG(0, "dmfe_clean_module() ", debug);
> + DMFE_DBUG(0, "dmfe_cleanup_module() ", debug);
> pci_unregister_driver(_driver);
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
The function name contains cleanup, not clean.
This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance,
as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
Thanks - seems like a obvious mistake.
Acked-by: Grant Grundler grund...@parisc-linux.org
---
The semantic patch is difficult to summarize, but is available in the cover
letter of this patch series.
drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
index c820560..50a0077 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static int __init dmfe_init_module(void)
static void __exit dmfe_cleanup_module(void)
{
- DMFE_DBUG(0, dmfe_clean_module() , debug);
+ DMFE_DBUG(0, dmfe_cleanup_module() , debug);
pci_unregister_driver(dmfe_driver);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
