Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-02-13 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:15:10 +0530, Vineet Gupta  
wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 04:31 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta 
> >  wrote:
> >> +- clock-frequency : the input clock frequency for the UART
> >> +- baud: baud rate for UART
> > change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
> > with other serial devices.
> 
> While I'm OK with this - I can only see of_serial.c following the rule :-)
> More importantly I'm not clear about the logistics of this fix. Obviously 
> this has
> a bearing on DT files in arch/arc/boot/*. So are such changes (platform + 
> driver)
> routed thru the subsystem tree or the arch tree or bits from both with
> bisectability not considered - which feels wrong. We have to also consider the
> fact that Greg has closed the tty/serial for 3.9. So while I have no 
> objection to
> your comment, it seems that the it needs to wait till 3.9-rc1 - or is there an
> alternate way.

I would consider it a bug fix. The binding isn't what it should be and
it needs to be addressed before appearing in a released kernel. If this
patch has already been merged, then write and post a fixup patch.

> >
> >> @@ -673,8 +693,18 @@ static int __init arc_serial_probe_earlyprintk(struct 
> >> platform_device *pdev)
> >>  static int arc_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  {
> >>int rc, dev_id;
> >> +  struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >> +
> >> +  /* no device tree device */
> >> +  if (!np)
> >> +  return -ENODEV;
> > This breaks non-DT users. Is this what you intend? It creates a flag day
> > where users have to switch from non-DT to DT cold-turkey.
> 
> Not supporting non-DT user was not the idea - it just simplifies the code a 
> bit
> given that it would only even be runtime used in a ARC Linux port based 
> platform -
> which unconditionally enables OF.  Further - the ARC port itself is not yet
> upstream so there are no "official" user of this in tree driver.
> FWIW, ARC Linux port was recently reviewed on lkml/arch mailing lists and is 
> now
> in linux-next for a possible 3.9 merge.

If there are no users, then nobody is broken. If this driver only
supports DT platforms then my comment can be ignored.

> >> +  dev_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
> >> +  if (dev_id < 0) {
> >> +  dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id: %d\n", dev_id);
> >> +  return dev_id;
> >> +  }
> > Don't fail on this. If you can't get an id then choose one dynamically.
> 
> You mean just assume 0.

No, I mean dynamically assign an ID from ids that are available. Say you
had two of these devices in a system, and neither had an alias; they
couldn't both be '0'.  :-)

g.

> 
> Thanks for reviewing.
> -Vineet

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-02-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 09 February 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2013 04:31 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta 
> >  wrote:
> >> +- clock-frequency   : the input clock frequency for the UART
> >> +- baud  : baud rate for UART
> > change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
> > with other serial devices.
> 
> While I'm OK with this - I can only see of_serial.c following the rule :-)
> More importantly I'm not clear about the logistics of this fix. Obviously 
> this has
> a bearing on DT files in arch/arc/boot/*. So are such changes (platform + 
> driver)
> routed thru the subsystem tree or the arch tree or bits from both with
> bisectability not considered - which feels wrong. We have to also consider the
> fact that Greg has closed the tty/serial for 3.9. So while I have no 
> objection to
> your comment, it seems that the it needs to wait till 3.9-rc1 - or is there an
> alternate way.

I'd consider this one a bug fix, so while Greg is not accepting any new
features for the serial tree, I think it should still get in that way
and should not be controversial as an add-on change.


Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-02-08 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Saturday 09 February 2013 04:31 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta  
> wrote:
>> +- clock-frequency   : the input clock frequency for the UART
>> +- baud  : baud rate for UART
> change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
> with other serial devices.

While I'm OK with this - I can only see of_serial.c following the rule :-)
More importantly I'm not clear about the logistics of this fix. Obviously this 
has
a bearing on DT files in arch/arc/boot/*. So are such changes (platform + 
driver)
routed thru the subsystem tree or the arch tree or bits from both with
bisectability not considered - which feels wrong. We have to also consider the
fact that Greg has closed the tty/serial for 3.9. So while I have no objection 
to
your comment, it seems that the it needs to wait till 3.9-rc1 - or is there an
alternate way.

>
>> @@ -673,8 +693,18 @@ static int __init arc_serial_probe_earlyprintk(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  static int arc_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  int rc, dev_id;
>> +struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> +/* no device tree device */
>> +if (!np)
>> +return -ENODEV;
> This breaks non-DT users. Is this what you intend? It creates a flag day
> where users have to switch from non-DT to DT cold-turkey.

Not supporting non-DT user was not the idea - it just simplifies the code a bit
given that it would only even be runtime used in a ARC Linux port based 
platform -
which unconditionally enables OF.  Further - the ARC port itself is not yet
upstream so there are no "official" user of this in tree driver.
FWIW, ARC Linux port was recently reviewed on lkml/arch mailing lists and is now
in linux-next for a possible 3.9 merge.

>> +dev_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
>> +if (dev_id < 0) {
>> +dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id: %d\n", dev_id);
>> +return dev_id;
>> +}
> Don't fail on this. If you can't get an id then choose one dynamically.

You mean just assume 0.

Thanks for reviewing.
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-02-08 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta  
wrote:
> * DT binding for arc-uart
> * With alll the bits in place we can now use DT probing.
> 
> Note that there's a bit of kludge right now because earlyprintk portion
> of driver can't use the DT infrastrcuture to get resoures/plat_data.
> This requires some infrastructre changes to of_flat_ framework
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta 
> Cc: Grant Likely 
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann 
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Alan Cox 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: Rob Herring 
> Cc: Rob Landley 
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/arc-uart.txt|   26 
>  drivers/tty/serial/arc_uart.c  |   43 ++-
>  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/arc-uart.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/arc-uart.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/arc-uart.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..c3bd8f9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/arc-uart.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +* Synopsys ARC UART : Non standard UART used in some of the ARC FPGA boards
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "snps,arc-uart"
> +- reg: offset and length of the register set for the 
> device.
> +- interrupts : device interrupt
> +- clock-frequency: the input clock frequency for the UART
> +- baud   : baud rate for UART

change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
with other serial devices.

g.

> @@ -673,8 +693,18 @@ static int __init arc_serial_probe_earlyprintk(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>  static int arc_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>   int rc, dev_id;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + /* no device tree device */
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;

This breaks non-DT users. Is this what you intend? It creates a flag day
where users have to switch from non-DT to DT cold-turkey.

> + dev_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
> + if (dev_id < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id: %d\n", dev_id);
> + return dev_id;
> + }

Don't fail on this. If you can't get an id then choose one dynamically.

>  
> - dev_id = pdev->id < 0 ? 0 : pdev->id;
>   rc = arc_uart_init_one(pdev, dev_id);
>   if (rc)
>   return rc;
> @@ -689,12 +719,19 @@ static int arc_serial_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id arc_uart_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "snps,arc-uart" },
> + { /* Sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arc_uart_dt_ids);
> +
>  static struct platform_driver arc_platform_driver = {
>   .probe = arc_serial_probe,
>   .remove = arc_serial_remove,
>   .driver = {
>   .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>   .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table  = arc_uart_dt_ids,
>},
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
> 

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-01-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 11 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2013 05:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > Quick question about the name though: is this UART only used
> > on ARC, or is it something that synopsys licenses to other
> > parties as well? If the latter is true, we might want to 
> > add a more generic "compatible" value for those that use
> > it on another architecture.
> 
> It's not licensed as standalone IP - since its not a standard 8250. It is only
> (but actively) used on the internal FPGA flows from ARC days.
> 
Ok, thanks for the confirmation.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-01-11 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Friday 11 January 2013 05:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> * DT binding for arc-uart
>> * With alll the bits in place we can now use DT probing.
>>
>> Note that there's a bit of kludge right now because earlyprintk portion
>> of driver can't use the DT infrastrcuture to get resoures/plat_data.
>> This requires some infrastructre changes to of_flat_ framework
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta 
>> Cc: Grant Likely 
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann 
>> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Alan Cox 
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
>> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: Rob Herring 
>> Cc: Rob Landley 
>> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 
>
> Quick question about the name though: is this UART only used
> on ARC, or is it something that synopsys licenses to other
> parties as well? If the latter is true, we might want to 
> add a more generic "compatible" value for those that use
> it on another architecture.

It's not licensed as standalone IP - since its not a standard 8250. It is only
(but actively) used on the internal FPGA flows from ARC days.

Thx,
Vineet

>   Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

2013-01-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 11 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> * DT binding for arc-uart
> * With alll the bits in place we can now use DT probing.
> 
> Note that there's a bit of kludge right now because earlyprintk portion
> of driver can't use the DT infrastrcuture to get resoures/plat_data.
> This requires some infrastructre changes to of_flat_ framework
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta 
> Cc: Grant Likely 
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann 
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Alan Cox 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: Rob Herring 
> Cc: Rob Landley 
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 

Quick question about the name though: is this UART only used
on ARC, or is it something that synopsys licenses to other
parties as well? If the latter is true, we might want to 
add a more generic "compatible" value for those that use
it on another architecture.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/