Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:14:59AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/10/19 9:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. > > > > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Preliminary. > > > > > > I see several mips build failures. > > > > > > arch/mips/kernel/proc.c: In function 'show_cpuinfo': > > > arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h:352:31: error: implicit declaration > > > of function '__ase' > > > > Thanks, will go drop the lone mips patch that I think is causing this > > problem. > > > > Looks like it did. For v4.14.148-61-g6f45e0e87a75: > > Build results: > total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 372 pass: 372 fail: 0 Great! Thanks for running this and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On 10/10/19 9:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. Preliminary. I see several mips build failures. arch/mips/kernel/proc.c: In function 'show_cpuinfo': arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h:352:31: error: implicit declaration of function '__ase' Thanks, will go drop the lone mips patch that I think is causing this problem. Looks like it did. For v4.14.148-61-g6f45e0e87a75: Build results: total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 372 pass: 372 fail: 0 Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On 10/10/2019 09:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h All tests passing for Tegra ... Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 24 tests: 24 pass, 0 fail Linux version: 4.14.149-rc1-g8952ae7352b2 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. > > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Preliminary. > > I see several mips build failures. > > arch/mips/kernel/proc.c: In function 'show_cpuinfo': > arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h:352:31: error: implicit declaration of > function '__ase' Thanks, will go drop the lone mips patch that I think is causing this problem. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On 10/10/19 2:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.149-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. thanks, -- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled, booted, and no regressions found on my x86_64 system. Thanks, Didik Setiawan
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. Internet is back, so here we are: Build results: total: 172 pass: 161 fail: 11 Failed builds: mips:defconfig mips:allmodconfig mips:bcm47xx_defconfig mips:bcm63xx_defconfig mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig mips:ath79_defconfig mips:ar7_defconfig mips:e55_defconfig mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig mips:malta_defconfig mips:rt305x_defconfig Qemu test results: total: 372 pass: 312 fail: 60 Failed tests: Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. Preliminary. I see several mips build failures. arch/mips/kernel/proc.c: In function 'show_cpuinfo': arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h:352:31: error: implicit declaration of function '__ase' Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
stable-rc/linux-4.14.y boot: 116 boots: 1 failed, 105 passed with 10 offline (v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2) Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2/ Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2/ Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-4.14.y Git Describe: v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2 Git Commit: 8952ae7352b2ed94c2a5f3c8ac3f5d1c96b43bb5 Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Tested: 64 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 15 builds out of 201 Boot Failure Detected: arm: multi_v7_defconfig: gcc-8: exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab Offline Platforms: arm: qcom_defconfig: gcc-8 qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 offline lab qcom-apq8064-ifc6410: 1 offline lab davinci_all_defconfig: gcc-8 dm365evm,legacy: 1 offline lab sunxi_defconfig: gcc-8 sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab sun7i-a20-bananapi: 1 offline lab multi_v7_defconfig: gcc-8 qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 offline lab qcom-apq8064-ifc6410: 1 offline lab sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab sun7i-a20-bananapi: 1 offline lab arm64: defconfig: gcc-8 apq8016-sbc: 1 offline lab --- For more info write to
Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 14:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release. > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Summary kernel: 4.14.149-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: 8952ae7352b2ed94c2a5f3c8ac3f5d1c96b43bb5 git describe: v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.148-62-g8952ae7352b2 No regressions (compared to build v4.14.148) No fixes (compared to build v4.14.148) Ran 22253 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - arm - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-timers-tests * perf * spectre-meltdown-checker-test * v4l2-compliance * ltp-fs-tests * network-basic-tests * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
