Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/30] 4.9.166-stable review
On 3/26/19 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.166 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Thu Mar 28 04:25:51 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.166-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. thanks, -- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/30] 4.9.166-stable review
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:29:39PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.166 release. > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 28 04:25:51 UTC 2019. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 316 pass: 316 fail: 0 Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/30] 4.9.166-stable review
On 26/03/2019 06:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.166 release. > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 28 04:25:51 UTC 2019. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.166-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h All tests are passing for Tegra ... Test results for stable-v4.9: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 20 tests: 20 pass, 0 fail Linux version: 4.9.166-rc1-gb7e63ff Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/30] 4.9.166-stable review
stable-rc/linux-4.9.y boot: 98 boots: 0 failed, 86 passed with 12 offline (v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9) Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9/ Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9/ Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-4.9.y Git Describe: v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9 Git Commit: b7e63ff5d9f9f1ae13c633d2b98e6b180398ff5f Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Tested: 50 unique boards, 22 SoC families, 15 builds out of 197 Offline Platforms: arm: bcm2835_defconfig: gcc-7 bcm2835-rpi-b: 1 offline lab multi_v7_defconfig: gcc-7 alpine-db: 1 offline lab at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 offline lab socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit: 1 offline lab sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab tegra124-jetson-tk1: 1 offline lab tegra_defconfig: gcc-7 tegra124-jetson-tk1: 1 offline lab sunxi_defconfig: gcc-7 sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab sama5_defconfig: gcc-7 at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 offline lab socfpga_defconfig: gcc-7 socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit: 1 offline lab arm64: defconfig: gcc-7 apq8016-sbc: 1 offline lab juno-r2: 1 offline lab --- For more info write to
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/30] 4.9.166-stable review
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 12:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.166 release. > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 28 04:25:51 UTC 2019. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.166-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. NOTE: We started running perf tests on all our kernel branches. Summary kernel: 4.9.166-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: b7e63ff5d9f9f1ae13c633d2b98e6b180398ff5f git describe: v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.165-31-gb7e63ff5d9f9 No regressions (compared to build v4.9.165) No fixes (compared to build v4.9.165) Ran 22730 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - arm - x86_64 Test Suites --- * boot * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-timers-tests * perf * spectre-meltdown-checker-test * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org