Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:36:06PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 3/15/2021 6:51 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels: > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Thanks for testing!
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On 2021/3/15 21:51, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.24, Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.24 Commit: 05d125f7524e9ad200375c52799575184755d340 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC) arm64: Testcase Result Summary: total: 4721 passed: 4720 failed: 0 timeout: 1 Timeout cases : ltp dio29 The only one timeout case is caused by the test machine was very busy and timed out, no kernel failures x86: Testcase Result Summary: total: 4721 passed: 4721 failed: 0 timeout: 0 Tested-by: Hulk Robot
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:51:33PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Compiled and booted with no regressions on x86_64. Tested-by: Ross Schmidt thanks, Ross
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On 2021/3/15 21:51, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Tested on arm64 for 5.10.24-rc1, Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.24-rc1 Commit: c6b3724e56923191dc567ceb626ba15daa49313c Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC) arm64: Testcase Result Summary: total_num: 4735 succeed_num: 4735 failed_num: 0 timeout_num: 0 Tested-by: Hulk Robot
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:51:33PM +0100, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 431 pass: 431 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:27, wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.24-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: c6b3724e56923191dc567ceb626ba15daa49313c git describe: v5.10.23-291-gc6b3724e5692 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.23-291-gc6b3724e5692 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.23) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.23) Ran 58761 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-lkdtm * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * fwts * kselftest- * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-cpufreq * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * rcutorture * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:51:33 +0100 gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. Tested on amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, m68k, or1k, powerpc, ppc64, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, sparc64. No problems detected. Tested-by: Jason Self pgpvOInva0nm7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (Renesas boards are still unavailable) https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review
On 3/15/2021 6:51 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release. > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian
