Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:33:22AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 12/28/20 4:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.86 release. > > There are 453 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:48:23 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > Building arm:multi_v5_defconfig ... failed > -- > Error log: > drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c: In function 'netxbig_leds_get_of_pdata': > drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c:571:13: error: 'gpio_ext_dev' undeclared THanks for reporting this, I'll go delete the offending patch... greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 01:43:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.86 release. > There are 453 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:48:23 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 157 pass: 154 fail: 3 Failed builds: arm:multi_v5_defconfig i386:tools/perf x86_64:tools/perf Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 Failures as reported. Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review
On 12/28/20 4:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.86 release. > There are 453 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:48:23 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Building arm:multi_v5_defconfig ... failed -- Error log: drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c: In function 'netxbig_leds_get_of_pdata': drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c:571:13: error: 'gpio_ext_dev' undeclared Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 19:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.86 release.
> There are 453 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:48:23 +.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Perf build failed on stable-rc 5.4 branch.
> Andrii Nakryiko
> libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF
In file included from btf.c:17:0:
btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr':
btf.c:104:48: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did
you mean 'data_size'?
pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
^
libbpf_internal.h:59:40: note: in definition of macro '__pr'
libbpf_print(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
^~~
btf.c:104:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_debug'
pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
^~~~
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
Full log link,
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.4/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=intel-corei7-64,label=docker-buster-lkft/346/consoleText
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
