Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 11:56 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:00:07PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote: > > * On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 15:30 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 > > > release. > > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a > > > response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, > > > please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux- > > > stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > hello, > > > > Compiled and booted 5.8.15-rc1+ . No typical dmesg regression. > > I also have something to mention here. I saw a warning related in > > several kernels which looks like the following... > > > > "MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible" > > > > But now in 5.8.15-rc1+ , that warning disappeared. > > Odds are your microcode/bios finally got updated on that machine, > right? > i do not think thot the bios got updoted, becouse the bug is still shown to be present in 5.8.13-rc1+ . so moy be the updoted kernel is fixing the bug or gives o workround. -- software engineer rajagiri school of engineering and technology
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:21:50PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/12/20 7:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.8.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. > > Tested-by: Shuah Khan Thanks for testing all of them and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:41:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0 > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck > Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:00:07PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote: > * On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 15:30 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a > > response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, > > please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux- > > stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > hello, > > Compiled and booted 5.8.15-rc1+ . No typical dmesg regression. > I also have something to mention here. I saw a warning related in > several kernels which looks like the following... > > "MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible" > > But now in 5.8.15-rc1+ , that warning disappeared. Odds are your microcode/bios finally got updated on that machine, right? thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:14:36AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.8.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Thanks for testing them all. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On 10/12/20 7:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan thanks, -- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.8.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.8.15-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.8.y git commit: f4ed6fb8f1680de812daf362f28342e6bf19fdcc git describe: v5.8.14-125-gf4ed6fb8f168 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.8.y/build/v5.8.14-125-gf4ed6fb8f168 No regressions (compared to build v5.8.14-5-g0b030df1725b) No fixes (compared to build v5.8.14-5-g0b030df1725b) Ran 37577 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * libhugetlbfs * ltp-sched-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * ltp-quickhit-tests * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none * ssuite -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/124] 5.8.15-rc1 review
* On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 15:30 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.15 release. > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a > response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, > please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:31:22 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.15-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux- > stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h hello, Compiled and booted 5.8.15-rc1+ . No typical dmesg regression. I also have something to mention here. I saw a warning related in several kernels which looks like the following... "MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible" But now in 5.8.15-rc1+ , that warning disappeared. Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T -- software engineer rajagiri school of engineering and technology
