Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-08-17 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:04:55AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> > 
> > At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
> > timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
> > the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
> > between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
> > in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
> > as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
> > idle state.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> > ---
> >  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
> >  Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
> >  handle the timekeeping duty.
> >  
> > +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > +   bool "Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system"
> > +   depends on NO_HZ_FULL
> > +   default n
> > +   help
> > +At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
> > +for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
> > +where "non-idle" includes CPUs with a single runnable task
> > +in adaptive-idle mode.
> 
> "adaptive-idle" is particularly confusing here. How about this:
> 
> 'where "non-idle" also includes dynticks CPUs as long they are
> running non-idle tasks.' 
> 
>   Because the underlying adaptive-tick
> > +support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
> > +all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
> 
> s/adaptive-idle/dynticks
> 
> Thanks.

Good point, fixed.

Thanx, Paul

> > +the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
> > +a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
> > +CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
> > +of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
> > +tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
> > +detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
> > +will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
> > +
> > +Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
> > +
> > +Say N if you are unsure.
> > +
> >  config NO_HZ
> > bool "Old Idle dynticks config"
> > depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.5
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-08-17 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:04:55AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
  From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
  
  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
  timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
  the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
  between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
  in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
  as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
  idle state.
  
  Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
  Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
  Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
  ---
   kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
  
  diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
  index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
  --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
  +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
  @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
   Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
   handle the timekeeping duty.
   
  +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
  +   bool Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system
  +   depends on NO_HZ_FULL
  +   default n
  +   help
  +At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
  +for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
  +where non-idle includes CPUs with a single runnable task
  +in adaptive-idle mode.
 
 adaptive-idle is particularly confusing here. How about this:
 
 'where non-idle also includes dynticks CPUs as long they are
 running non-idle tasks.' 
 
   Because the underlying adaptive-tick
  +support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
  +all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
 
 s/adaptive-idle/dynticks
 
 Thanks.

Good point, fixed.

Thanx, Paul

  +the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
  +a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
  +CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
  +of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
  +tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
  +detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
  +will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
  +
  +Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
  +
  +Say N if you are unsure.
  +
   config NO_HZ
  bool Old Idle dynticks config
  depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET  GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
  -- 
  1.8.1.5
  
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-08-04 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> 
> At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
> timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
> the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
> between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
> in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
> as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
> idle state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> ---
>  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
>Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
>handle the timekeeping duty.
>  
> +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> + bool "Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system"
> + depends on NO_HZ_FULL
> + default n
> + help
> +  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
> +  for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
> +  where "non-idle" includes CPUs with a single runnable task
> +  in adaptive-idle mode.

"adaptive-idle" is particularly confusing here. How about this:

'where "non-idle" also includes dynticks CPUs as long they are
running non-idle tasks.' 

  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
> +  support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
> +  all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,

s/adaptive-idle/dynticks

Thanks.

> +  the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
> +  a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
> +  CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
> +  of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
> +  tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
> +  detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
> +  will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
> +
> +  Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
> +
> +  Say N if you are unsure.
> +
>  config NO_HZ
>   bool "Old Idle dynticks config"
>   depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-08-04 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
 From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 
 At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
 timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
 the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
 between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
 in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
 as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
 idle state.
 
 Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
 Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
 ---
  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
 index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
 --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
 +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
 @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
handle the timekeeping duty.
  
 +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
 + bool Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system
 + depends on NO_HZ_FULL
 + default n
 + help
 +  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
 +  for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
 +  where non-idle includes CPUs with a single runnable task
 +  in adaptive-idle mode.

adaptive-idle is particularly confusing here. How about this:

'where non-idle also includes dynticks CPUs as long they are
running non-idle tasks.' 

  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
 +  support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
 +  all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,

s/adaptive-idle/dynticks

Thanks.

 +  the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
 +  a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
 +  CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
 +  of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
 +  tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
 +  detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
 +  will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
 +
 +  Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
 +
 +  Say N if you are unsure.
 +
  config NO_HZ
   bool Old Idle dynticks config
   depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET  GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
 -- 
 1.8.1.5
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-07-29 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 07/27/2013 07:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> > 
> > At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
> > timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
> > the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
> > between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
> > in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
> > as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
> > idle state.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> > ---
> >  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
> >  Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
> >  handle the timekeeping duty.
> >  
> > +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > +   bool "Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system"
> > +   depends on NO_HZ_FULL
> > +   default n
> > +   help
> > +At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
> > +for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
> > +where "non-idle" includes CPUs with a single runnable task
> > +in adaptive-idle mode.  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
> > +support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
> > +all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
> > +the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
> > +a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
> > +CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
> > +of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
> > +tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
> > +detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
> > +will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
> > +
> > +Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
> 
> The code is needed only for debug?
> I guess not.

The code is not used only for debug, but if you enable it now, you will
likely be helping to debug it.  ;-)

Thanx, Paul

> > +
> > +Say N if you are unsure.
> > +
> >  config NO_HZ
> > bool "Old Idle dynticks config"
> > depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-07-29 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
 On 07/27/2013 07:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
  From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
  
  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
  timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
  the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
  between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
  in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
  as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
  idle state.
  
  Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
  Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
  Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
  ---
   kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
  
  diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
  index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
  --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
  +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
  @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
   Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
   handle the timekeeping duty.
   
  +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
  +   bool Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system
  +   depends on NO_HZ_FULL
  +   default n
  +   help
  +At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
  +for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
  +where non-idle includes CPUs with a single runnable task
  +in adaptive-idle mode.  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
  +support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
  +all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
  +the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
  +a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
  +CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
  +of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
  +tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
  +detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
  +will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
  +
  +Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
 
 The code is needed only for debug?
 I guess not.

The code is not used only for debug, but if you enable it now, you will
likely be helping to debug it.  ;-)

Thanx, Paul

  +
  +Say N if you are unsure.
  +
   config NO_HZ
  bool Old Idle dynticks config
  depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET  GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-07-28 Thread Lai Jiangshan
On 07/27/2013 07:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> 
> At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
> timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
> the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
> between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
> in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
> as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
> idle state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> ---
>  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
>Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
>handle the timekeeping duty.
>  
> +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> + bool "Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system"
> + depends on NO_HZ_FULL
> + default n
> + help
> +  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
> +  for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
> +  where "non-idle" includes CPUs with a single runnable task
> +  in adaptive-idle mode.  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
> +  support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
> +  all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
> +  the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
> +  a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
> +  CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
> +  of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
> +  tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
> +  detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
> +  will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
> +
> +  Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.

The code is needed only for debug?
I guess not.

> +
> +  Say N if you are unsure.
> +
>  config NO_HZ
>   bool "Old Idle dynticks config"
>   depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

2013-07-28 Thread Lai Jiangshan
On 07/27/2013 07:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
 From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 
 At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
 timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
 the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
 between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
 in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
 as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
 idle state.
 
 Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
 Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
 ---
  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
 index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
 --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
 +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
 @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
handle the timekeeping duty.
  
 +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
 + bool Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system
 + depends on NO_HZ_FULL
 + default n
 + help
 +  At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
 +  for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
 +  where non-idle includes CPUs with a single runnable task
 +  in adaptive-idle mode.  Because the underlying adaptive-tick
 +  support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
 +  all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
 +  the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
 +  a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
 +  CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
 +  of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
 +  tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
 +  detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
 +  will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
 +
 +  Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.

The code is needed only for debug?
I guess not.

 +
 +  Say N if you are unsure.
 +
  config NO_HZ
   bool Old Idle dynticks config
   depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET  GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/