Re: [PATCH RT 3/6] rt: Make cpu_chill() use hrtimer instead of msleep()
On 03/07/2014 03:52 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> Now that you posted "cpu_chill: Add a UNINTERRUPTIBLE >> hrtimer_nanosleep" wouldn't it make sense to delay this patches from >> the stable series until we get them all in one go? > > Sure, say this on the day I'm about to release ;-) Haven't noticed that earlier. > Nah, I'll release these today anyway. Otherwise I can't update to the > mainline stables. When the rc candidates are out, it holds up any new > updates to the versions. > > Also, the stable 3.10 has this bug already. Might as well update all > the stables with the same fix. It makes it easier on my side, as the > way I do the updates is to use the same quilt queue for all releases. I > start with 3.10, and get them working, and then apply the same queue to > 3.8. Any conflicts in the patch I do a quilt fork, with a -v3.8 > appended, and then after getting that working I go to 3.4, and so on. > This also lets me drop patches that are not applicable for earlier > releases. > > If I delay this for a new update, then 3.10 will be out of sync. I'm > just going to release these, and then we can start a new one right away. No worries. Do as it is easier for you. > > Thanks! > > -- Steve > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH RT 3/6] rt: Make cpu_chill() use hrtimer instead of msleep()
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:51:55 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 03/05/2014 01:33 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > 3.2.55-rt79-rc1 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > Now that you posted "cpu_chill: Add a UNINTERRUPTIBLE > hrtimer_nanosleep" wouldn't it make sense to delay this patches from > the stable series until we get them all in one go? Sure, say this on the day I'm about to release ;-) Nah, I'll release these today anyway. Otherwise I can't update to the mainline stables. When the rc candidates are out, it holds up any new updates to the versions. Also, the stable 3.10 has this bug already. Might as well update all the stables with the same fix. It makes it easier on my side, as the way I do the updates is to use the same quilt queue for all releases. I start with 3.10, and get them working, and then apply the same queue to 3.8. Any conflicts in the patch I do a quilt fork, with a -v3.8 appended, and then after getting that working I go to 3.4, and so on. This also lets me drop patches that are not applicable for earlier releases. If I delay this for a new update, then 3.10 will be out of sync. I'm just going to release these, and then we can start a new one right away. Thanks! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH RT 3/6] rt: Make cpu_chill() use hrtimer instead of msleep()
On 03/05/2014 01:33 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > 3.2.55-rt79-rc1 stable review patch. > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. Now that you posted "cpu_chill: Add a UNINTERRUPTIBLE hrtimer_nanosleep" wouldn't it make sense to delay this patches from the stable series until we get them all in one go? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
