Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie

2020-12-01 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:02 AM Florent Revest  wrote:
>
> This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks whether
> the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in
> cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the
> userspace part of the test.
>
> Adding a tracing program to the existing objects requires a different
> attachment strategy and different headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest 
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c  | 41 ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c| 18 +---
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
> index 0cb5656a22b0..a11026aeaaf1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  // Copyright (c) 2018 Facebook
>
> -#include 
> -#include 
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
>
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
> +
> +#define AF_INET6 10
>
>  struct socket_cookie {
> __u64 cookie_key;
> @@ -19,6 +21,14 @@ struct {
> __type(value, struct socket_cookie);
>  } socket_cookies SEC(".maps");
>
> +/*
> + * These three programs get executed in a row on connect() syscalls. The
> + * userspace side of the test creates a client socket, issues a connect() on 
> it
> + * and then checks that the local storage associated with this socket has:
> + * cookie_value == local_port << 8 | 0xFF
> + * The different parts of this cookie_value are appended by those hooks if 
> they
> + * all agree on the output of bpf_get_socket_cookie().
> + */
>  SEC("cgroup/connect6")
>  int set_cookie(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>  {
> @@ -32,14 +42,14 @@ int set_cookie(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> if (!p)
> return 1;
>
> -   p->cookie_value = 0xFF;
> +   p->cookie_value = 0xF;
> p->cookie_key = bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx);
>
> return 1;
>  }
>
>  SEC("sockops")
> -int update_cookie(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx)
> +int update_cookie_sockops(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx)
>  {
> struct bpf_sock *sk;
> struct socket_cookie *p;
> @@ -60,11 +70,32 @@ int update_cookie(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx)
> if (p->cookie_key != bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx))
> return 1;
>
> -   p->cookie_value = (ctx->local_port << 8) | p->cookie_value;
> +   p->cookie_value |= (ctx->local_port << 8);
>
> return 1;
>  }
>
> +SEC("fexit/inet_stream_connect")
> +int BPF_PROG(update_cookie_tracing, struct socket *sock,
> +struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len, int flags)
> +{
> +   struct socket_cookie *p;
> +
> +   if (uaddr->sa_family != AF_INET6)
> +   return 0;
> +
> +   p = bpf_sk_storage_get(_cookies, sock->sk, 0, 0);
> +   if (!p)
> +   return 0;
> +
> +   if (p->cookie_key != bpf_get_socket_cookie(sock->sk))
> +   return 0;
> +
> +   p->cookie_value |= 0xF0;
> +
> +   return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int _version SEC("version") = 1;

please remove this, while you are at it

>
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
> index ca7ca87e91aa..0d955c65a4f8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd)
> struct bpf_prog_load_attr attr;
> struct bpf_program *prog;
> struct bpf_object *pobj;
> +   struct bpf_link *link;
> const char *prog_name;
> int server_fd = -1;
> int client_fd = -1;
> @@ -153,11 +154,18 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd)
> bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, pobj) {
> prog_name = bpf_program__section_name(prog);
>
> -   if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, _type))
> -   goto err;
> -
> -   err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd, 
> attach_type,
> - BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
> +   if (bpf_program__is_tracing(prog)) {
> +   link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
> +   err = !link;

link is a pointer, so use libbpf_get_error()

> +   continue;
> +   } else {

else branch is not really necessary, just adds indentation unnecessarily

> +   if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, 
> _type))
> +   goto err;
> +
> +   err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd,
> + attach_type,
> + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
> +   }
> if (err) {
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie

2020-11-27 Thread Florent Revest
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 23:56 -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> On 11/26/20 9:02 AM, Florent Revest wrote:
> > This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks
> > whether
> > the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in
> > cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the
> > userspace part of the test.
> > 
> > Adding a tracing program to the existing objects requires a
> > different
> > attachment strategy and different headers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Florent Revest 
> > ---
> >   .../selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c  | 41
> > ---
> >   .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c| 18 +---
> 
> Do you think it is possible to migrate test_socket_cookie.c to
> selftests/bpf/prog_tests so it can be part of test_progs so
> it will be regularly exercised?

I suppose it's possible, I can give it a try :)



Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie

2020-11-26 Thread Yonghong Song




On 11/26/20 9:02 AM, Florent Revest wrote:

This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks whether
the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in
cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the
userspace part of the test.

Adding a tracing program to the existing objects requires a different
attachment strategy and different headers.

Signed-off-by: Florent Revest 
---
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c  | 41 ---
  .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c| 18 +---


Do you think it is possible to migrate test_socket_cookie.c to
selftests/bpf/prog_tests so it can be part of test_progs so
it will be regularly exercised?


  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
index 0cb5656a22b0..a11026aeaaf1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  // Copyright (c) 2018 Facebook
  

[...]

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
index ca7ca87e91aa..0d955c65a4f8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd)
struct bpf_prog_load_attr attr;
struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_object *pobj;
+   struct bpf_link *link;
const char *prog_name;
int server_fd = -1;
int client_fd = -1;
@@ -153,11 +154,18 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd)
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, pobj) {
prog_name = bpf_program__section_name(prog);
  
-		if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, _type))

-   goto err;
-
-   err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd, attach_type,
- BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
+   if (bpf_program__is_tracing(prog)) {
+   link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
+   err = !link;
+   continue;
+   } else {
+   if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, _type))
+   goto err;
+
+   err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd,
+ attach_type,
+ BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
+   }
if (err) {
log_err("Failed to attach prog %s", prog_name);
goto out;