Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:41:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) >>wrote: >>>From: Myungho Jung>>> >>>[ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] >>> >>>Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree >>>family of functions. >>> >>>Link: >>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.kernel.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D195289=DwIBAg=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=bUtaaC9mlBij4OjEG_D-KPul_335azYzfC4Rjgomobo=iXzciSQOaZF7sggj-m_1eQCbmqf43dsIy8ogFRdIvSE=kZBpt2uE3l0TtR50y0QmqJyb1Wp3A-FB-GVfkwnTgVI= >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung >>>Signed-off-by: David S. Miller >>>Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin >> >>Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that >>you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking >>for review for these before they get submitted? > >This is a different series. Figured I'd do 2-3 in parallel to speed up things. Sorry, just to clarify, I'm waiting for reviews on this one. I'll improve the patch subject prefix next time to clearify that. -- Thanks, Sasha
Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:41:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) >>wrote: >>>From: Myungho Jung >>> >>>[ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] >>> >>>Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree >>>family of functions. >>> >>>Link: >>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.kernel.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D195289=DwIBAg=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=bUtaaC9mlBij4OjEG_D-KPul_335azYzfC4Rjgomobo=iXzciSQOaZF7sggj-m_1eQCbmqf43dsIy8ogFRdIvSE=kZBpt2uE3l0TtR50y0QmqJyb1Wp3A-FB-GVfkwnTgVI= >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung >>>Signed-off-by: David S. Miller >>>Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin >> >>Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that >>you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking >>for review for these before they get submitted? > >This is a different series. Figured I'd do 2-3 in parallel to speed up things. Sorry, just to clarify, I'm waiting for reviews on this one. I'll improve the patch subject prefix next time to clearify that. -- Thanks, Sasha
Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:41:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: >> From: Myungho Jung>> >> [ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] >> >> Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree >> family of functions. >> >> Link: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.kernel.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D195289=DwIBAg=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=bUtaaC9mlBij4OjEG_D-KPul_335azYzfC4Rjgomobo=iXzciSQOaZF7sggj-m_1eQCbmqf43dsIy8ogFRdIvSE=kZBpt2uE3l0TtR50y0QmqJyb1Wp3A-FB-GVfkwnTgVI= >> >> Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > >Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that >you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking >for review for these before they get submitted? This is a different series. Figured I'd do 2-3 in parallel to speed up things. -- Thanks, Sasha
Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:41:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: >> From: Myungho Jung >> >> [ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] >> >> Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree >> family of functions. >> >> Link: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.kernel.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D195289=DwIBAg=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=bUtaaC9mlBij4OjEG_D-KPul_335azYzfC4Rjgomobo=iXzciSQOaZF7sggj-m_1eQCbmqf43dsIy8ogFRdIvSE=kZBpt2uE3l0TtR50y0QmqJyb1Wp3A-FB-GVfkwnTgVI= >> >> Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > >Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that >you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking >for review for these before they get submitted? This is a different series. Figured I'd do 2-3 in parallel to speed up things. -- Thanks, Sasha
Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: > From: Myungho Jung> > [ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] > > Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree > family of functions. > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195289 > > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking for review for these before they get submitted? thanks, greg k-h
Re: [PATCH for 4.9 01/39] net: core: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19:36AM +, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: > From: Myungho Jung > > [ Upstream commit 9899886d5e8ec5b343b1efe44f185a0e68dc6454 ] > > Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree > family of functions. > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195289 > > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Is this a different series from your original XX/59 patch series that you feel is ready to go into the stable tree, or are you still asking for review for these before they get submitted? thanks, greg k-h