Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks

2017-10-03 Thread Michal Hocko
On Sat 30-09-17 12:05:53, Wei Wang wrote:
> This patch adds support to walk through the free page blocks in the
> system and report them via a callback function. Some page blocks may
> leave the free list after zone->lock is released, so it is the caller's
> responsibility to either detect or prevent the use of such pages.
> 
> One use example of this patch is to accelerate live migration by skipping
> the transfer of free pages reported from the guest. A popular method used
> by the hypervisor to track which part of memory is written during live
> migration is to write-protect all the guest memory. So, those pages that
> are reported as free pages but are written after the report function
> returns will be captured by the hypervisor, and they will be added to the
> next round of memory transfer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Li 
> Cc: Michal Hocko 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin 

Acked-by: Michal Hocko 

> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |  6 
>  mm/page_alloc.c| 91 
> ++
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 46b9ac5..d9652c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1835,6 +1835,12 @@ extern void free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long 
> * zones_size,
>   unsigned long zone_start_pfn, unsigned long *zholes_size);
>  extern void free_initmem(void);
>  
> +extern void walk_free_mem_block(void *opaque,
> + int min_order,
> + bool (*report_pfn_range)(void *opaque,
> +  unsigned long pfn,
> +  unsigned long num));
> +
>  /*
>   * Free reserved pages within range [PAGE_ALIGN(start), end & PAGE_MASK)
>   * into the buddy system. The freed pages will be poisoned with pattern
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6d00f74..c6bb874 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4762,6 +4762,97 @@ void show_free_areas(unsigned int filter, nodemask_t 
> *nodemask)
>   show_swap_cache_info();
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Walk through a free page list and report the found pfn range via the
> + * callback.
> + *
> + * Return false if the callback requests to stop reporting. Otherwise,
> + * return true.
> + */
> +static bool walk_free_page_list(void *opaque,
> + struct zone *zone,
> + int order,
> + enum migratetype mt,
> + bool (*report_pfn_range)(void *,
> +  unsigned long,
> +  unsigned long))
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> + struct list_head *list;
> + unsigned long pfn, flags;
> + bool ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(>lock, flags);
> + list = >free_area[order].free_list[mt];
> + list_for_each_entry(page, list, lru) {
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + ret = report_pfn_range(opaque, pfn, 1 << order);
> + if (!ret)
> + break;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * walk_free_mem_block - Walk through the free page blocks in the system
> + * @opaque: the context passed from the caller
> + * @min_order: the minimum order of free lists to check
> + * @report_pfn_range: the callback to report the pfn range of the free pages
> + *
> + * If the callback returns false, stop iterating the list of free page 
> blocks.
> + * Otherwise, continue to report.
> + *
> + * Please note that there are no locking guarantees for the callback and
> + * that the reported pfn range might be freed or disappear after the
> + * callback returns so the caller has to be very careful how it is used.
> + *
> + * The callback itself must not sleep or perform any operations which would
> + * require any memory allocations directly (not even GFP_NOWAIT/GFP_ATOMIC)
> + * or via any lock dependency. It is generally advisable to implement
> + * the callback as simple as possible and defer any heavy lifting to a
> + * different context.
> + *
> + * There is no guarantee that each free range will be reported only once
> + * during one walk_free_mem_block invocation.
> + *
> + * pfn_to_page on the given range is strongly discouraged and if there is
> + * an absolute need for that make sure to contact MM people to discuss
> + * potential problems.
> + *
> + * The function itself might sleep so it cannot be called from atomic
> + * contexts.
> + *
> + * In general low orders tend to be very volatile and so it makes more
> + * sense to query larger ones first for various optimizations which like
> + * ballooning etc... This will reduce the overhead as 

Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks

2017-10-03 Thread Michal Hocko
On Sat 30-09-17 12:05:53, Wei Wang wrote:
> This patch adds support to walk through the free page blocks in the
> system and report them via a callback function. Some page blocks may
> leave the free list after zone->lock is released, so it is the caller's
> responsibility to either detect or prevent the use of such pages.
> 
> One use example of this patch is to accelerate live migration by skipping
> the transfer of free pages reported from the guest. A popular method used
> by the hypervisor to track which part of memory is written during live
> migration is to write-protect all the guest memory. So, those pages that
> are reported as free pages but are written after the report function
> returns will be captured by the hypervisor, and they will be added to the
> next round of memory transfer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Li 
> Cc: Michal Hocko 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin 

Acked-by: Michal Hocko 

> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |  6 
>  mm/page_alloc.c| 91 
> ++
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 46b9ac5..d9652c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1835,6 +1835,12 @@ extern void free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long 
> * zones_size,
>   unsigned long zone_start_pfn, unsigned long *zholes_size);
>  extern void free_initmem(void);
>  
> +extern void walk_free_mem_block(void *opaque,
> + int min_order,
> + bool (*report_pfn_range)(void *opaque,
> +  unsigned long pfn,
> +  unsigned long num));
> +
>  /*
>   * Free reserved pages within range [PAGE_ALIGN(start), end & PAGE_MASK)
>   * into the buddy system. The freed pages will be poisoned with pattern
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6d00f74..c6bb874 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4762,6 +4762,97 @@ void show_free_areas(unsigned int filter, nodemask_t 
> *nodemask)
>   show_swap_cache_info();
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Walk through a free page list and report the found pfn range via the
> + * callback.
> + *
> + * Return false if the callback requests to stop reporting. Otherwise,
> + * return true.
> + */
> +static bool walk_free_page_list(void *opaque,
> + struct zone *zone,
> + int order,
> + enum migratetype mt,
> + bool (*report_pfn_range)(void *,
> +  unsigned long,
> +  unsigned long))
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> + struct list_head *list;
> + unsigned long pfn, flags;
> + bool ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(>lock, flags);
> + list = >free_area[order].free_list[mt];
> + list_for_each_entry(page, list, lru) {
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + ret = report_pfn_range(opaque, pfn, 1 << order);
> + if (!ret)
> + break;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * walk_free_mem_block - Walk through the free page blocks in the system
> + * @opaque: the context passed from the caller
> + * @min_order: the minimum order of free lists to check
> + * @report_pfn_range: the callback to report the pfn range of the free pages
> + *
> + * If the callback returns false, stop iterating the list of free page 
> blocks.
> + * Otherwise, continue to report.
> + *
> + * Please note that there are no locking guarantees for the callback and
> + * that the reported pfn range might be freed or disappear after the
> + * callback returns so the caller has to be very careful how it is used.
> + *
> + * The callback itself must not sleep or perform any operations which would
> + * require any memory allocations directly (not even GFP_NOWAIT/GFP_ATOMIC)
> + * or via any lock dependency. It is generally advisable to implement
> + * the callback as simple as possible and defer any heavy lifting to a
> + * different context.
> + *
> + * There is no guarantee that each free range will be reported only once
> + * during one walk_free_mem_block invocation.
> + *
> + * pfn_to_page on the given range is strongly discouraged and if there is
> + * an absolute need for that make sure to contact MM people to discuss
> + * potential problems.
> + *
> + * The function itself might sleep so it cannot be called from atomic
> + * contexts.
> + *
> + * In general low orders tend to be very volatile and so it makes more
> + * sense to query larger ones first for various optimizations which like
> + * ballooning etc... This will reduce the overhead as well.
> + */
> +void walk_free_mem_block(void *opaque,
> +  int min_order,
>