Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 13:24:12 Yuanhan Liu wrote: > acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, > but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. > > I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu Applied to linux-pm.git/acpi-next as v3.8 material. Thanks, Rafael > --- > include/linux/acpi.h |5 - > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > index 90be989..a468429 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, > resource_size_t n, > > int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION > void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); > +#endif > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); > void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 13:24:12 Yuanhan Liu wrote: acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu yuanhan@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com Applied to linux-pm.git/acpi-next as v3.8 material. Thanks, Rafael --- include/linux/acpi.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 90be989..a468429 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n, int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:24:53PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:24:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, > > but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. > > > > I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function > > ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > This should be more clear: > > Fix build error on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP: Actually, there are more erros besides the followling one on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. This patch just fix one obvious one: the logical is wrong. Thanks, Yuanhan Liu > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ > > The root cause is, acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() is defined in > #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the > declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. > > Thanks, > Fengguang > > > v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu > > --- > > include/linux/acpi.h |5 - > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > > index 90be989..a468429 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > > @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, > > resource_size_t n, > > > > int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION > > void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); > > +#endif > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); > > void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); > > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > > -- > > 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:24:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, > but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. > > I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] This should be more clear: Fix build error on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ The root cause is, acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. Thanks, Fengguang > v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu > --- > include/linux/acpi.h |5 - > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > index 90be989..a468429 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, > resource_size_t n, > > int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION > void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); > +#endif > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); > void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > -- > 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:24:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] This should be more clear: Fix build error on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ The root cause is, acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. Thanks, Fengguang v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu yuanhan@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com --- include/linux/acpi.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 90be989..a468429 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n, int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:24:53PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:24:12PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] This should be more clear: Fix build error on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP: Actually, there are more erros besides the followling one on !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. This patch just fix one obvious one: the logical is wrong. Thanks, Yuanhan Liu arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ The root cause is, acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block, but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block. Thanks, Fengguang v2: take better title and add build error message suggested by Fengguang Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu yuanhan@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com --- include/linux/acpi.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 90be989..a468429 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n, int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void); #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
