RE: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > 2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar : > > On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: > >> Commit "cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver > >> support" deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule > >> in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. > >> > >> Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from > >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein > >> --- > >> I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and > >> undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). > >> > >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += > >> arm_big_little_dt.o > >> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > And again from me: > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Dear Kukjin, > Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12 > cpufreq patches? > OK, sure. I'll take this. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar : > On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: >> Commit "cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver >> support" deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule >> in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. >> >> Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein >> --- >> I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and >> undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). >> >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile >> index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile >> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += >> arm_big_little_dt.o >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar And again from me: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Dear Kukjin, Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12 cpufreq patches? BR, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: > Commit "cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver > support" deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule > in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. > > Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein > --- > I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and > undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). > > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += > arm_big_little_dt.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org: On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: Commit cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein jonas.rabenst...@studium.uni-erlangen.de --- I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org And again from me: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com Dear Kukjin, Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12 cpufreq patches? BR, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: Commit cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein jonas.rabenst...@studium.uni-erlangen.de --- I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: 2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org: On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: Commit cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein jonas.rabenst...@studium.uni-erlangen.de --- I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org And again from me: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com Dear Kukjin, Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12 cpufreq patches? OK, sure. I'll take this. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
