Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86_64,entry: Rearrange the syscall exit optimizations
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Linus, I suspect you'll either like or hate this series. Or maybe > you'll think it's crazy but you'll like it anyway. I'm curious > which of those is the case. :) I have no hugely strong reaction to the patches, but it seems to be a good simplification of our model, in addition to allowing sysret for more cases. So Ack, as far as I'm concerned. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86_64,entry: Rearrange the syscall exit optimizations
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Linus, I suspect you'll either like or hate this series. Or maybe you'll think it's crazy but you'll like it anyway. I'm curious which of those is the case. :) I have no hugely strong reaction to the patches, but it seems to be a good simplification of our model, in addition to allowing sysret for more cases. So Ack, as far as I'm concerned. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
