Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 07/03/2017 11:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xiao GuangrongChangelog in v2: thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if PML is supported Hi Paolo, Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. Thanks for your understanding, Sure, i fully understand, thank you for bearing my push. :)
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 07/03/2017 11:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xiao Guangrong Changelog in v2: thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if PML is supported Hi Paolo, Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. Thanks for your understanding, Sure, i fully understand, thank you for bearing my push. :)
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Xiao Guangrong>> >> Changelog in v2: >> thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if >> PML is supported > > Hi Paolo, > > Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) > Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. Thanks for your understanding, Paolo
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Xiao Guangrong >> >> Changelog in v2: >> thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if >> PML is supported > > Hi Paolo, > > Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) > Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first. Thanks for your understanding, Paolo
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xiao GuangrongChangelog in v2: thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if PML is supported Hi Paolo, Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? Thanks!
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xiao Guangrong Changelog in v2: thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if PML is supported Hi Paolo, Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;) Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged? Thanks!