Nobody like this patch? :)
In my test, for a 72MB perf.data (with LBR data), the perf annotate
processing speed:
Before: 10.2s
After: 2.2s
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 3/16/2019 5:16 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
is called. But it looks it's not necessary. In hist__account_cycles, it
already walks on all branch entries.
This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.
Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++
(in __symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback,
so the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).
With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps
(in annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be
hidden.
Now, we can try, for example:
perf record -b ...
perf annotate or perf report -s symbol
The before/after output should be no change.
v3:
---
Fix the crash in stdio mode.
Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
before hist__account_cycles()
v2:
---
1. Cover the similar perf report
2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao
---
tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 4 ++--
tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 11 +--
tools/perf/util/annotate.c| 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 67f9d9f..77deb3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct
hist_entry_iter *iter,
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
int err;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
-
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(>from, sample, evsel);
@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
if (a.map != NULL)
a.map->dso->hit = 1;
+ hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
+
ret = hist_entry_iter__add(, , PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 1921aaa..493e115 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct
hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
return 0;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(>from, sample, evsel);
@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct
hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
return 0;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
bi = he->branch_info;
err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(>from, sample, evsel);
if (err)
@@ -282,6 +276,11 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (al.map != NULL)
al.map->dso->hit = 1;
+ if (ui__has_annotation() || rep->symbol_ipc) {
+ hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, , sample,
+rep->nonany_branch_mode);
+ }
+
ret = hist_entry_iter__add(, , rep->max_stack, rep);
if (ret < 0)
pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 5f6dbbf..e8080c0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation
*notes, u64 start, u64
float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
/* Hide data when there are too many overlaps. */
- if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff || ch->reset >= ch->num / 2)
+ if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
return;
for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {
