Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL to 0

2021-01-28 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:00:06PM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> 
> On 1/27/21 1:43 PM, richard.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Richard Gong 
> >
> > Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which
> > aligns with the firmware settings.
> 
> For fixes, you need to have a 'Fixes: ... ' line in the comment.
> 
> This lets folks doing the stable branch know how far back to apply the fix.

It is a nice hint, but not always needed, and is NOT how to trigger a
patch to be backported to stable kernels.  Please read the documentation
on how to properly do that.

thanks,

greg k-h


Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL to 0

2021-01-28 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:43:21PM -0600, richard.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Richard Gong 
> 
> Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which
> aligns with the firmware settings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong 
> ---
>  include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)



This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.




Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL to 0

2021-01-27 Thread Tom Rix


On 1/27/21 1:43 PM, richard.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Richard Gong 
>
> Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which
> aligns with the firmware settings.

For fixes, you need to have a 'Fixes: ... ' line in the comment.

This lets folks doing the stable branch know how far back to apply the fix.

For this case, this is likely

Fixes: 36847f9e3e56 ("firmware: stratix10-svc: correct reconfig flag and 
timeout values")

This should go right above your signoff.


By stand alone patch, this change should be split out from your current 

[PATCHv3 1/6] firmware: stratix10-svc: add COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM flag

So the next rev out your patch set will have 7 patches, because 1/6 is being 
split into two patches.

I would recommend the fix be 1/7, to minimize chance of conflicts merging it 
with stable.

or

submit the split out fix first.

Tom

>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong 
> ---
>  include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h 
> b/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h
> index ebc2956..1ffb982 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h
> @@ -51,12 +51,12 @@
>  #define SVC_STATUS_NO_SUPPORT6
>  
>  /*
> - * Flag bit for COMMAND_RECONFIG
> + * Flag for COMMAND_RECONFIG, in bit number
>   *
>   * COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL:
> - * Set to FPGA configuration type (full or partial).
> + * Set for partial configuration.
>   */
> -#define COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL1
> +#define COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL0
>  
>  /*
>   * Timeout settings for service clients: